Petroff Rebekah L, Dolinoy Dana C, Padmanabhan Vasantha, Goodrich Jaclyn M
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Epigenet Rep. 2024;2(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/28361512.2024.2427955. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
DNA methylation, an epigenetic mark, has become a common outcome in epidemiological studies with the aid of affordable and reliable technologies. Yet the most widespread technique used to assess methylation, bisulfite conversion, does not allow for the differentiation of regular DNA methylation (5-mC) and other cytosine modifications, like that of hydroxymethylation (5-hmC). As both 5-mC and 5-hmC have distinct biological roles, sometimes with opposing effects, it is crucial to understand the difference between these marks. To characterize 5-mC and 5-hmC in cord blood and expand on previously published results in smaller cohorts, 73 samples from infants in the Michigan Mother Infant Pairs cohort were paired bisulfite and oxidative bisulfite converted. 5-mC and 5-hmC were assessed on the Illumina Infinium EPIC array, using maximum likelihood methods, and sex-specific differences of these marks were analyzed. 5-mC and 5-hmC were both broadly distributed across the genome, and 5-hmC was prevalent, with proportions of 0.01-0.55. Sex-specific analysis revealed total methylation was different on 17,000 sites (q<0.05), but only different at 1,866 and 5 sites of 5-mC and 5-hmC specifically. These results add additional support to the literature and demonstrate the importance of differentiating between 5-mC and 5-hmC in epidemiological studies going forward.
DNA甲基化作为一种表观遗传标记,借助经济实惠且可靠的技术,已成为流行病学研究中的常见结果。然而,用于评估甲基化的最广泛使用的技术——亚硫酸氢盐转化,无法区分常规DNA甲基化(5-甲基胞嘧啶,5-mC)和其他胞嘧啶修饰,如羟甲基化(5-羟甲基胞嘧啶,5-hmC)。由于5-mC和5-hmC具有不同的生物学作用,有时甚至具有相反的效应,因此了解这些标记之间的差异至关重要。为了表征脐带血中的5-mC和5-hmC,并扩展先前在较小队列中发表的结果,对密歇根母婴配对队列中73名婴儿的样本进行了亚硫酸氢盐和氧化亚硫酸氢盐转化配对。使用最大似然法在Illumina Infinium EPIC阵列上评估5-mC和5-hmC,并分析了这些标记的性别特异性差异。5-mC和5-hmC在全基因组中广泛分布,5-hmC普遍存在,比例为0.01 - 0.55。性别特异性分析显示,在17,000个位点上总甲基化存在差异(q<0.05),但5-mC和(此处原文有误,结合前文推测应该还是5-hmC)5-hmC分别仅在1,866个和5个位点上存在差异。这些结果为文献提供了更多支持,并证明了在未来的流行病学研究中区分5-mC和5-hmC的重要性。