Suppr超能文献

利用Illumina EPIC芯片表征脐带血中的DNA甲基化和羟甲基化并鉴定性别特异性差异

Characterizing DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation in Cord Blood and Identifying Sex-Specific Differences using the Illumina EPIC Array.

作者信息

Petroff Rebekah L, Dolinoy Dana C, Padmanabhan Vasantha, Goodrich Jaclyn M

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Epigenet Rep. 2024;2(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/28361512.2024.2427955. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

Abstract

DNA methylation, an epigenetic mark, has become a common outcome in epidemiological studies with the aid of affordable and reliable technologies. Yet the most widespread technique used to assess methylation, bisulfite conversion, does not allow for the differentiation of regular DNA methylation (5-mC) and other cytosine modifications, like that of hydroxymethylation (5-hmC). As both 5-mC and 5-hmC have distinct biological roles, sometimes with opposing effects, it is crucial to understand the difference between these marks. To characterize 5-mC and 5-hmC in cord blood and expand on previously published results in smaller cohorts, 73 samples from infants in the Michigan Mother Infant Pairs cohort were paired bisulfite and oxidative bisulfite converted. 5-mC and 5-hmC were assessed on the Illumina Infinium EPIC array, using maximum likelihood methods, and sex-specific differences of these marks were analyzed. 5-mC and 5-hmC were both broadly distributed across the genome, and 5-hmC was prevalent, with proportions of 0.01-0.55. Sex-specific analysis revealed total methylation was different on 17,000 sites (q<0.05), but only different at 1,866 and 5 sites of 5-mC and 5-hmC specifically. These results add additional support to the literature and demonstrate the importance of differentiating between 5-mC and 5-hmC in epidemiological studies going forward.

摘要

DNA甲基化作为一种表观遗传标记,借助经济实惠且可靠的技术,已成为流行病学研究中的常见结果。然而,用于评估甲基化的最广泛使用的技术——亚硫酸氢盐转化,无法区分常规DNA甲基化(5-甲基胞嘧啶,5-mC)和其他胞嘧啶修饰,如羟甲基化(5-羟甲基胞嘧啶,5-hmC)。由于5-mC和5-hmC具有不同的生物学作用,有时甚至具有相反的效应,因此了解这些标记之间的差异至关重要。为了表征脐带血中的5-mC和5-hmC,并扩展先前在较小队列中发表的结果,对密歇根母婴配对队列中73名婴儿的样本进行了亚硫酸氢盐和氧化亚硫酸氢盐转化配对。使用最大似然法在Illumina Infinium EPIC阵列上评估5-mC和5-hmC,并分析了这些标记的性别特异性差异。5-mC和5-hmC在全基因组中广泛分布,5-hmC普遍存在,比例为0.01 - 0.55。性别特异性分析显示,在17,000个位点上总甲基化存在差异(q<0.05),但5-mC和(此处原文有误,结合前文推测应该还是5-hmC)5-hmC分别仅在1,866个和5个位点上存在差异。这些结果为文献提供了更多支持,并证明了在未来的流行病学研究中区分5-mC和5-hmC的重要性。

相似文献

9
MLML: consistent simultaneous estimates of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation.MLML:一致的同时估计 DNA 甲基化和羟甲基化。
Bioinformatics. 2013 Oct 15;29(20):2645-6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt459. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验