Ng Ka Ting, Kwok Pei En, Lim Wei En, Teoh Wan Yi, Hasan Mohd Shahnaz, Zainal Abidin Mohd Fitry
University of Malaya, Department of Anesthesiology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Quinnipiac University Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Waterbury Hospital, Department of Surgery, North Haven, United States.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):844580. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844580. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
Methylene blue exerts its vasopressor properties by inhibiting nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation. Recent studies have advocated the use of methylene blue as a rescue therapy for patients with septic shock. The primary aim was to investigate the effect of methylene blue on the mean arterial pressure among adult patients with septic shock.
Databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from their inception date until October 2023. Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) comparing methylene blue and placebo in adults with septic shock were included.
Our systematic review included 5 studies (n = 257) for data analysis. As compared to the placebo, our pooled analysis showed that methylene blue significantly increased mean arterial pressure (MD: 1.34 mmHg, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.53, p = 0.03, level of evidence: very low). Patients who were given methylene blue were associated with statistically lower mortality rate (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.88, p = 0.02, level of evidence: low), reduced serum lactate levels (MD: -0.76 mmoL.L, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.31, p = 0.0009, level of evidence: low), reduced length of hospital stay (MD: -1.94 days, 95% CI -3.79 to -0.08, p = 0.04, level of evidence: low), and increased PaO/FiO (MD: 34.78, 95% CI 8.94 to 60.61, p = 0.008, level of evidence: low).
This meta-analysis demonstrated that methylene blue administration was associated with an increased in mean arterial pressure and PaO/FiO ratio, along with a reduction in mortality rates, serum lactate levels, and length of hospital stay. However, substantial degree of heterogeneity and inadequate number of studies with low level of evidence warrant future adequately powered RCTs to affirm our results.
亚甲蓝通过抑制一氧化氮介导的血管舒张发挥其升压特性。最近的研究主张将亚甲蓝用作感染性休克患者的挽救疗法。主要目的是研究亚甲蓝对成年感染性休克患者平均动脉压的影响。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,检索时间从其创建日期至2023年10月。纳入比较亚甲蓝与安慰剂治疗成年感染性休克患者的随机临床试验(RCT)。
我们的系统评价纳入5项研究(n = 257)进行数据分析。与安慰剂相比,我们的汇总分析显示亚甲蓝显著提高了平均动脉压(MD:1.34 mmHg,95% CI 0.15至2.53,p = 0.03,证据级别:极低)。接受亚甲蓝治疗的患者死亡率在统计学上较低(OR = 0.49,95% CI 0.27至0.88,p = 0.02,证据级别:低),血清乳酸水平降低(MD:-0.76 mmol/L,95% CI -1.22至-0.31,p = 0.0009,证据级别:低),住院时间缩短(MD:-1.94天,95% CI -3.79至-0.08,p = 0.04,证据级别:低),动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数(PaO/FiO)增加(MD:34.78,95% CI 8.94至60.61,p = 0.008,证据级别:低)。
这项荟萃分析表明,给予亚甲蓝与平均动脉压和PaO/FiO比值增加相关,同时死亡率、血清乳酸水平和住院时间缩短。然而,存在相当程度的异质性且研究数量不足、证据级别低,需要未来进行有足够效力的RCT来证实我们的结果。