• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

园艺采后损失及其社会经济和环境影响。

Horticultural postharvest loss' and its socio-economic and environmental impacts.

作者信息

Ali Abdelrahman, Tan Yanwen, Medani Khalid, Xia Chunping, Abdullahi Nazir Muhammad, Mahmood Irfan, Yang Shilong

机构信息

School of Economics & Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China; Agricultural Economics Department, Agricultural College, Fayoum University, Fayoum, 63514, Egypt.

School of Economics & Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123458. Epub 2024 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123458
PMID:39616780
Abstract

Food losses and waste (FLW) have multidimensional environmental, social, and economic impacts, and avoidance efforts may yield better environmental gains than recovery. Horticulture has the highest FLW (≈50% of production loss), representing 38% of total global FLW. The primary data were collected from 343 grape farmers and middlemen in Egypt, and the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology and the Category Method (C-Method) have been employed to estimate the percentage of Postharvest Losses (PHL) and its socio-economic and environmental effects across the supply chain (SC). Empirical findings show average PHL percentages of 10.06%, 5.82%, 6.53%, and 7.06% for growers, rural traders, wholesalers, and retailers. The total arable land, water, and energy consumed to grow this lost food are estimated at around 23 thousand hectares, 158 million m³, and 3.16 billion MJ of fossil energy (96.9 million liters of petrol), besides other agricultural inputs. This costs the economy of Egypt about $203.5 million yearly and emits 145 million tons of CO2eq. These findings highlight the significant role of cooperative marketing, shorter supply chains, and access to cold shipping, handling, and storage services to sustain product quality. Furthermore, agricultural education and extension are necessary to disseminate the best postharvest practices to increase stakeholders' knowledge and sustainably enhance SC actors' skills for using limited resources. These interventions require intensive public-private investment to incentivize small stakeholders to mitigate PHLs, accelerate food system transformation, and achieve sustainable production and consumption patterns.

摘要

粮食损失和浪费(FLW)具有多方面的环境、社会和经济影响,而且避免损失的努力可能比回收利用带来更好的环境效益。园艺业的粮食损失和浪费最为严重(约占生产损失的50%),占全球粮食损失和浪费总量的38%。主要数据收集自埃及的343名葡萄种植户和中间商,并采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法和类别法(C-方法)来估算供应链(SC)中收获后损失(PHL)的百分比及其社会经济和环境影响。实证研究结果表明,种植户、农村贸易商、批发商和零售商的收获后损失平均百分比分别为10.06%、5.82%、6.53%和7.06%。除其他农业投入外,种植这些损失的粮食所消耗的耕地、水和能源总量估计约为2.3万公顷、1.58亿立方米和31.6亿兆焦耳的化石能源(9690万升汽油)。这使埃及经济每年损失约2.035亿美元,并排放1.45亿吨二氧化碳当量。这些研究结果凸显了合作营销、缩短供应链以及获得冷链运输、处理和储存服务对于维持产品质量的重要作用。此外,农业教育和推广对于传播最佳收获后做法、增加利益相关者的知识以及可持续提高供应链参与者利用有限资源的技能是必要的。这些干预措施需要大量的公私投资,以激励小利益相关者减轻收获后损失,加速粮食系统转型,并实现可持续的生产和消费模式。

相似文献

1
Horticultural postharvest loss' and its socio-economic and environmental impacts.园艺采后损失及其社会经济和环境影响。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123458. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
2
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
3
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Food loss of perishable produce from farm to retail: evidence from tomato supply chains in South India.易腐农产品从农场到零售环节的食物损失:来自印度南部番茄供应链的证据。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun 7;115(6):1535-1548. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac039.
5
Wasted Food, Wasted Resources? A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Analysis of Food Loss and Waste Generation and Treatment.浪费的食物,浪费的资源?对食物损失和浪费产生及处理的环境影响分析的批判性回顾。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 30;58(17):7240-7255. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c08426. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
Assessing the environmental impacts of halving food loss and waste along the food supply chain.评估沿食品供应链减少一半食物损失和浪费对环境的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 10;712:136255. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136255. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
7
Six Collective Challenges for Sustainability of Almería Greenhouse Horticulture.阿尔梅里亚温室园艺可持续发展的六大共同挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 24;16(21):4097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214097.
8
A systems approach to assessing environmental and economic effects of food loss and waste interventions in the United States.一种评估美国食物损失和浪费干预措施的环境与经济影响的系统方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 1;685:1240-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.230. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Structured evaluation of food loss and waste prevention and avoidable impacts: A simplified method.结构化评估食物损失和浪费预防及可避免影响:一种简化方法。
Waste Manag Res. 2018 Aug;36(8):698-707. doi: 10.1177/0734242X18778779. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
10
Scale and Environmental Impacts of Food Loss and Waste in China-A Material Flow Analysis.中国食物损失和浪费的规模及其环境影响——物质流分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):460. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010460.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Farmers' and Intermediaries' Practices as Determinants of Food Waste Reduction Across the Supply Chain.优化农民和中间商的做法作为减少整个供应链食物浪费的决定因素。
Foods. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):2351. doi: 10.3390/foods14132351.