Suppr超能文献

使用液相色谱-质谱联用技术对乳腺癌患者血浆中CDK4/6抑制剂与内分泌治疗进行临床测定的三种样品制备方法:交叉验证(红色)、生态学(绿色)和经济性(蓝色)评估。

Three sample preparation methods for clinical determination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy in breast cancer patient plasma using LC-MS: Cross-validation (red), ecological (green) and economical (blue) assessment.

作者信息

Turković Lu, Mlinarić Zvonimir, Lovrić Mila, Silovski Tajana, Nigović Biljana, Sertić Miranda

机构信息

University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Ante Kovačića 1, Zagreb, Croatia.

University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Analytical Toxicology and Pharmacology Division, Kišpatićeva 12, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.

出版信息

J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2025 Mar 15;255:116586. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116586. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Abstract

Cyclin D-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, in combination with aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole or oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant, are being assessed as candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring. An ideal bioanalytical method for their determination in patient plasma samples is therefore of high interest, as there is no routine reference method yet available in the clinical practice. In this work, three sample preparation approaches - dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and newly developed phospholipid removal (PLR) for LC-MS determination of these six drugs are comprehensively assessed. The methods are validated in the clinically relevant linear ranges with remarkable precision (RSD ≤6.9 %) and accuracy (bias -13.6 - 11.8 %). To compare the procedures in a real-world setting, they are applied on 38 samples from breast cancer patients. The differences between paired results are below 20 % for more than 92 % of the repeats and the RSD is ≤13.1 % between the corresponding results. Statistical comparison of the results reveals excellent overall agreement between the methods (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient ≥0.9969, maximal Bland-Altman bias 6.3 %). DLLME proved to be the most ecologically acceptable method due to the high degree of miniaturisation (AGREEprep score 0.44), PLR enabled very high sample throughput and cost-effectiveness (BAGI 72.5), while SPE showed the best analytical performance (redness score 100). All three methods are suitable for their designated purpose, and the choice of the ideal method can be made based on the scope of application, available funds and equipment and desired ecological footprint.

摘要

细胞周期蛋白D依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂哌柏西利、瑞博西尼和阿贝西利,与芳香化酶抑制剂阿那曲唑和来曲唑或雌激素受体降解剂氟维司群联合使用,正在作为治疗药物监测的候选药物进行评估。因此,一种用于在患者血浆样本中测定这些药物的理想生物分析方法备受关注,因为临床实践中尚无常规参考方法。在这项工作中,全面评估了三种样品制备方法——分散液液微萃取(DLLME)、固相萃取(SPE)以及新开发的用于液相色谱-质谱法测定这六种药物的磷脂去除(PLR)方法。这些方法在临床相关线性范围内得到验证,具有显著的精密度(相对标准偏差≤6.9%)和准确度(偏差-13.6%至11.8%)。为了在实际环境中比较这些方法,将它们应用于38份乳腺癌患者的样本。超过92%的重复检测中,配对结果之间的差异低于20%,相应结果之间的相对标准偏差≤13.1%。结果的统计比较显示,这些方法之间总体一致性极佳(林氏一致性相关系数≥0.9969,最大布兰德-奥特曼偏差6.3%)。由于高度微型化,DLLME被证明是最符合生态要求的方法(AGREEprep评分0.44),PLR实现了非常高的样品通量和成本效益(BAGI 72.5),而SPE表现出最佳的分析性能(红色评分100)。所有三种方法都适用于其指定用途,可以根据应用范围、可用资金和设备以及所需的生态足迹来选择理想的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验