Steele Ric G, McGuire Austen B, Kingston Neal
Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Dole Human Development Building, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS, 66045 USA.
National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425 USA.
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2024 Oct;55(5):405-416. doi: 10.1037/pro0000565. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
Despite efforts to incorporate evidence-based practice into mental health settings, there has been inconsistent success doing so. Several barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice have been identified, including limitations in time and statistical training. One promising approach to further bridge the science-practice gap is the greater use of meta-analytic studies to clarify the magnitude of treatment effects and to understand components of treatments that are more effective within specific populations. Although several articles have been published to help mental health trainees and providers understand and interpret meta-analyses, they may not be sufficient without extensive training in statistical techniques. The purpose of this article is to provide and explain the use of the as a means by which mental health providers at all professional levels can use meta-analytic findings to make clinical judgements regarding treatment approaches in the context of ongoing or new cases. A case example is provided to illustrate the use of the Worksheet in clinical decision-making.
尽管人们努力将循证实践纳入心理健康环境，但在这方面取得的成功并不一致。已确定了循证实践实施的几个障碍，包括时间和统计培训方面的限制。进一步弥合科学与实践差距的一种有前景的方法是更多地使用元分析研究，以阐明治疗效果的大小，并了解在特定人群中更有效的治疗组成部分。尽管已经发表了几篇文章来帮助心理健康实习生和提供者理解和解释元分析，但如果没有广泛的统计技术培训，这些文章可能还不够。本文的目的是提供并解释使用[此处原文缺失具体内容]作为一种手段，通过它所有专业水平的心理健康提供者可以利用元分析结果，对正在进行的或新的病例中的治疗方法做出临床判断。提供了一个案例示例来说明该工作表在临床决策中的使用。
