Suppr超能文献

肩胛上神经阻滞与肩关节腔内注射技术治疗粘连性肩周炎患者的疗效比较

Comparison of the treatment efficacy of suprascapular nerve block and intra-articular shoulder injection techniques in patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis.

作者信息

Sarı Muhammet Hüseyin, Akdağ Ali, Hekim Hanife Hale, Bilgilisoy-Filiz Meral

机构信息

Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

PM R. 2025 May;17(5):505-512. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13286. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adhesive capsulitis (AC) is a common cause of shoulder disability. Interventional procedures are used along with many other treatment methods. There are insufficient studies directly comparing the superiority of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and intra-articular shoulder injection (IAI) techniques, which are frequently used interventional methods in treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ultrasonography-guided SSNB and IAI techniques in terms of pain and functional status in the treatment of AC.

DESIGN

A single-center, double-blind randomized study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of Antalya Training and Research Hospital between March and October 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-four participants aged 15 to 75 years with a clinical diagnosis of AC were screened for the study, and 60 participants were included in the study after excluding participants who did not meet the criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized into two groups with 30 participants in each group. Both groups received an injection of 1 mL of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and 9 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride under ultrasonographic guidance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The patients' Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores, shoulder active and passive range of motions (ROM), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated before and after the injection in the 1st week, 4th week, and 12th week.

RESULTS

Our study found no significant difference in SPADI and ROM between the two groups when comparing pre-injection and post-injection results in 1st week, 4th week, and 12th week. When pre-injection and 1st week, 1st week and 4th week, 4th week and 12th-week measurements were compared, improvement in SPADI-Disability scores, SPADI-Total scores, active flexion, passive flexion, active abduction, passive abduction, and active extension ROM values continued until the 12th week in both groups. In both groups, improvement in SPADI-Pain scores, active external rotation, and passive external rotation ROM values continued until the 4th week. In terms of VAS scores, passive extension, active internal rotation, and passive internal rotation ROM values, there was a statistically significant improvement in both groups after the injection compared to pre-injection.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of SSNB and IAI techniques in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis was found to be similar. In both methods, significant improvements were observed in SPADI, ROM, and VAS measurements compared to baseline.

摘要

背景

粘连性肩关节囊炎(AC)是导致肩部功能障碍的常见原因。介入治疗与许多其他治疗方法一起使用。直接比较肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)和肩关节腔内注射(IAI)技术(治疗中常用的介入方法)优越性的研究不足。

目的

比较超声引导下SSNB和IAI技术在治疗AC时在疼痛和功能状态方面的疗效。

设计

单中心、双盲随机研究。

地点

该研究于2022年3月至10月在安塔利亚培训和研究医院的物理治疗与康复门诊进行。

参与者

对84名年龄在15至75岁、临床诊断为AC的参与者进行研究筛查,排除不符合标准的参与者后,60名参与者纳入研究。

干预措施

参与者随机分为两组,每组30名。两组均在超声引导下注射1 mL 40 mg曲安奈德和9 mL 0.5%盐酸布比卡因。

主要观察指标

在注射前、注射后第1周、第4周和第12周评估患者的肩关节疼痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)评分、肩部主动和被动活动范围(ROM)以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。

结果

我们的研究发现,在比较第1周、第4周和第12周注射前和注射后的结果时,两组之间的SPADI和ROM没有显著差异。当比较注射前与第1周、第1周与第4周、第4周与第12周的测量结果时,两组的SPADI-功能障碍评分、SPADI-总分、主动屈曲、被动屈曲、主动外展、被动外展和主动伸展ROM值的改善持续到第12周。在两组中,SPADI-疼痛评分、主动外旋和被动外旋ROM值的改善持续到第4周。在VAS评分、被动伸展、主动内旋和被动内旋ROM值方面,两组注射后与注射前相比有统计学意义的改善。

结论

发现SSNB和IAI技术在治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎方面的疗效相似。与基线相比,两种方法在SPADI、ROM和VAS测量方面均观察到显著改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验