Stakeholder perspectives on educational needs and supports for students with developmental language disorder.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Students with developmental language disorder (DLD) often experience academic underachievement, and require adjustments and accommodations to access the curriculum. Teachers, allied health professionals and parents/caregivers have varying roles in the education process, and it is essential they work together to provide optimal support. However, their perspectives on the areas of functioning most impacting learning, the difficulty of school-based tasks and the helpfulness of educational support have received limited attention.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: A between-group survey design was used with recruitment occurring from September 2020 to October 2021. A total of 293 participants was comprised of teachers (n = 78), allied health professionals (n = 138) and parents/caregivers (n = 77). All respondents rated the learning impact of seven areas of functioning (academic behaviour, fine/gross motor, language/communication, literacy, numeracy, sensory and social/emotional), the difficulty of 39 school-based tasks, and the helpfulness of 27 educational supports for primary and/or secondary school-aged students with DLD. The groups of school-based tasks were combined into seven subscales (academic behaviour-related tasks, fine/gross motor tasks, language/communication tasks, literacy tasks, numeracy tasks, sensory-related tasks and social/emotional tasks) for analysis. The educational supports were also combined into six subscales (additional time, differentiation/adjustments, individualized support, social/emotional support, technology and visual supports).

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: All participants rated literacy and language/communication as the areas of functioning most impacting learning and requiring the highest level of support for students with DLD. Literacy tasks were rated the most difficult across stakeholder groups. However, comparison between stakeholder groups showed statistically significant differences between ratings for six (of seven) areas of functioning. Statistically significant differences were identified when rating the difficulty of four (of seven) school-based task subscales. Additional time and visual supports were rated the most helpful educational supports across groups. Overall, teachers and allied health professionals rated areas of functioning and school-based tasks as more difficult than parents/caregivers, although they shared similar perspectives on five (of six) educational support subscales.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Literacy and language/communication are the areas of functioning rated to be most impacting learning for students with DLD. However, literacy tasks were reported to be the most difficult for students with DLD to complete. Teachers, allied health professionals and parents/caregivers are recommended to regularly discuss the areas of functioning, school-based tasks and educational support to facilitate inclusive educational practices. Future research needs to consider the perspectives of students with DLD.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject There is extensive evidence demonstrating the increased risk of academic failure for students with DLD, particularly with literacy and numeracy. Although research on academic achievement or individual groups has occurred, limited research has compared stakeholders supporting students with DLD, which is vital for collaboration and optimal inclusive educational practices. What this study adds to the existing knowledge Teachers, allied health professionals and parents/caregivers have unique roles in the education of students with DLD and show differing perspectives that may link to these roles. Literacy and language/communication were the areas of functioning rated as most impacting learning, whilst literacy tasks were the most difficult activity undertaken at school for primary and secondary school-aged students with DLD. Additional time and visual support were rated as the most helpful educational supports for students with DLD. What are the practical and clinical implications of this work? Stakeholders demonstrate variable views on the areas of functioning and school-based tasks requiring support for students with DLD; however, they agreed on the helpfulness of most educational supports. Participants rated social/emotional tasks easier and their related supports less helpful than other areas of functioning. Given the associations between academic underachievement and mental health difficulties, more consideration needs to be given to the social/emotional well-being of students with DLD in school. Taken together, establishing differences in perspective will help with the implementation of inclusive educational practices.