• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定临床试验中特应性皮炎回顾(RECAP)工具的最小重要变化。

Determining the minimal important change of the recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) instrument in clinical trials.

作者信息

Baker Arabella, Stuart Beth, Howells Laura, Mitchell Eleanor J, Thomas Kim S

机构信息

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.

College of Nursing and Midwifery Birmingham City University Birmingham UK.

出版信息

Skin Health Dis. 2024 Oct 26;4(6):e470. doi: 10.1002/ski2.470. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/ski2.470
PMID:39624761
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11608894/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) is a patient-reported instrument designed to assess eczema control. There is a lack of evidence on the interpretability of change scores in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To calculate the smallest detectable change (SDC) in RECAP and estimate the minimal important change (MIC) for RECAP using various calculation methods in three eczema clinical trial datasets.

METHODS

In this study, four anchor-based methods (within-person score change, between-patient score change, predictive modelling, receiver operating characteristic curve) and a distribution-based method (effect size) was used to determine the MIC of RECAP. The trial datasets involved children (0-12 years), young people (13-25 years) and adults (>25 years) with all eczema severities.

RESULTS

A total of 698 participants were included in this study. The SDC was between 1.74 and 1.80. For the anchor-based methods, the patient global assessment anchor provided MIC values ranging from 2.35 to 3.94 and the patient oriented eczema measure anchor yielded values between 1.11 and 3.62. The MIC for the distribution-based method ranged from 2.66 to 3.06, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The interpretability of RECAP was improved by establishing MIC values and the following thresholds are suggested for interpreting changes in RECAP scores: <2.0 points is possibly a measurement error; 2.0-2.9 points denotes a small improvement that may be clinically relevant; 3.0-3.9 points indicates an improvement that is likely to be clinically important and ≥4.0 points is highly likely to represent a clinically important change.

摘要

背景

特应性皮炎回顾性评估(RECAP)是一种患者报告的用于评估湿疹控制情况的工具。目前缺乏关于临床试验中变化分数可解释性的证据。

目的

在三个湿疹临床试验数据集中,使用多种计算方法计算RECAP的最小可检测变化(SDC),并估计RECAP的最小重要变化(MIC)。

方法

在本研究中,采用四种基于锚定的方法(个体内分数变化、患者间分数变化、预测模型、受试者操作特征曲线)和一种基于分布的方法(效应量)来确定RECAP的MIC。试验数据集涉及所有严重程度的儿童(0至12岁)、年轻人(13至25岁)和成年人(>25岁)。

结果

本研究共纳入698名参与者。SDC在1.74至1.80之间。对于基于锚定的方法,患者整体评估锚定得出的MIC值在2.35至3.94之间,患者导向性湿疹测量锚定得出的值在1.11至3.62之间。基于分布的方法得出的MIC分别在2.66至3.06之间。

结论

通过建立MIC值提高了RECAP的可解释性,建议使用以下阈值来解释RECAP分数的变化:<2.0分可能是测量误差;2.0 - 2.9分表示可能具有临床相关性的小改善;3.0 - 3.9分表明可能具有临床重要性的改善,≥4.0分极有可能代表具有临床重要性的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c3/11608894/9129b582cc88/SKI2-4-e470-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c3/11608894/9129b582cc88/SKI2-4-e470-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40c3/11608894/9129b582cc88/SKI2-4-e470-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Determining the minimal important change of the recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) instrument in clinical trials.确定临床试验中特应性皮炎回顾(RECAP)工具的最小重要变化。
Skin Health Dis. 2024 Oct 26;4(6):e470. doi: 10.1002/ski2.470. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
The construct validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema questionnaire (RECAP) in children.特应性皮炎 RECAP 问卷的构建效度、反应度、信度和可解释性在儿童中的研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 May 17;190(6):867-875. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae017.
3
Validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) questionnaire.特应性皮炎简明问卷(RECAP)的有效性、信度、反应度和可诠释性。
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Oct 25;189(5):578-587. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad247.
4
The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure: estimating the minimal important change in an outpatient clinic cohort.以患者为导向的湿疹测量:评估门诊队列中的最小重要变化。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):1273-1279. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16122. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Validation of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) and a Comparison with the Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP).特应性皮炎控制工具(ADCT)的验证及与特应性湿疹问卷摘要(RECAP)的比较。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2025 Feb 18;105:adv42364. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v105.42364.
6
How should minimally important change scores for the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure be interpreted? A validation using varied methods.患者导向湿疹量表的最小重要变化分数应如何解释?使用不同方法进行验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 May;178(5):1135-1142. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16367. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Development and initial testing of a new instrument to measure the experience of eczema control in adults and children: Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP).一种用于测量成人和儿童湿疹控制体验的新工具的开发与初步测试:特应性皮炎回顾(RECAP)
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;183(3):524-536. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18780. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Content validity of the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) instrument in Dutch, English and German to measure eczema control in young people with atopic eczema: a cognitive interview study.荷兰语、英语和德语版特应性皮炎 RECAP 量表评估青少年特应性皮炎患者湿疹控制情况的内容效度:一项认知访谈研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Dec;187(6):919-926. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21767. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Responsiveness and interpretability of the Hand Eczema Severity Index.手部湿疹严重程度指数的反应性与可解释性。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;182(4):932-939. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18295. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Harmonizing measurement of eczema control: mapping scores between the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool and the Recap of Atopic Eczema instrument.协调湿疹控制的测量:绘制特应性皮炎控制工具和特应性湿疹总结工具之间的评分对应关系。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Aug 18;193(3):451-457. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf167.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Atopic Dermatitis Control in Chinese Patients: Validation of the Chinese Version of Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP) and an Investigation into Its Interpretability.评估中国患者特应性皮炎的控制情况:特应性湿疹问卷摘要(RECAP)中文版的验证及其可解释性调查。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2025 Jul 8;105:adv43458. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v105.43458.

本文引用的文献

1
The construct validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema questionnaire (RECAP) in children.特应性皮炎 RECAP 问卷的构建效度、反应度、信度和可解释性在儿童中的研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 May 17;190(6):867-875. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae017.
2
Validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) questionnaire.特应性皮炎简明问卷(RECAP)的有效性、信度、反应度和可诠释性。
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Oct 25;189(5):578-587. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad247.
3
Evaluating the effect of weekly patient-reported symptom monitoring on trial outcomes: results of the Eczema Monitoring Online randomized controlled trial.
评估每周患者报告症状监测对试验结局的影响:在线湿疹监测随机对照试验的结果。
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Jul 17;189(2):180-187. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad163.
4
Eczema Care Online behavioural interventions to support self-care for children and young people: two independent, pragmatic, randomised controlled trials.支持儿童和青少年自我护理的湿疹护理在线行为干预:两项独立、实用的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2022 Dec 7;379:e072007. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072007.
5
Content validity of the Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) instrument in Dutch, English and German to measure eczema control in young people with atopic eczema: a cognitive interview study.荷兰语、英语和德语版特应性皮炎 RECAP 量表评估青少年特应性皮炎患者湿疹控制情况的内容效度:一项认知访谈研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Dec;187(6):919-926. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21767. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
The HOME Core outcome set for clinical trials of atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎临床试验的 HOME 核心结局集。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun;149(6):1899-1911. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
Prevalence of most common skin diseases in Europe: a population-based study.欧洲最常见皮肤病的患病率:一项基于人群的研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Jul;36(7):1088-1096. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18050. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Validation of the RECap of AtoPic eczema measure of eczema control for use in dermatology clinics.用于皮肤科诊所的特应性皮炎湿疹控制RECap测量方法的验证。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Feb;47(2):440-442. doi: 10.1111/ced.14934. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
9
Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.最小重要变化(MIC):对患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)指标的MIC估计值进行概念澄清和系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2729-2754. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02925-y. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
10
Assessing the validity, responsiveness and reliability of the Recap measure of eczema control.评估湿疹控制的Recap指标的有效性、反应性和可靠性。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 May;184(5):955-957. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19709. Epub 2021 Feb 1.