• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者导向湿疹量表的最小重要变化分数应如何解释?使用不同方法进行验证。

How should minimally important change scores for the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure be interpreted? A validation using varied methods.

机构信息

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K.

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2018 May;178(5):1135-1142. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16367. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1111/bjd.16367
PMID:29355894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6001667/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), scored 0-28, is the core outcome instrument recommended for measuring patient-reported atopic eczema symptoms in clinical trials. To date, two published studies have broadly concurred that the minimally important change (MIC) of the POEM is three points. Further assessment of the MIC of POEM in different populations, and using a variety of methods, will improve interpretability of the POEM in research and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To calculate the smallest detectable change in the POEM and estimate the MIC of the POEM using a variety of methods in a trial dataset of children with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema.

METHODS

This study used distribution-based and anchor-based methods to calculate the MIC of the POEM in children with moderate-to-severe eczema.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 300 children. The smallest detectable change was 2·13. The MIC estimates were 1·07 (using 0·2 SD of baseline POEM scores) and 2·68 (using 0·5 SD of baseline POEM scores) based on distribution-based methods; were 3·09-6·13 based on patient-/parent-reported anchor-based methods; and were 3·23-5·38 based on investigator-reported anchor-based methods.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend the following thresholds be used to interpret changes in POEM scores: ≤ 2, unlikely to be a change beyond measurement error; 2·1-2·9, a small change detected that is likely to be beyond measurement error but may not be clinically important; 3-3·9, probably a clinically important change; ≥ 4, very likely to be a clinically important change.

摘要

背景

患者导向的湿疹量表(POEM),评分范围为 0-28,是临床试验中测量患者报告的特应性皮炎症状的核心结局指标。迄今为止,已有两项已发表的研究广泛认为 POEM 的最小临床重要差异(MIC)为 3 分。进一步评估 POEM 在不同人群中的 MIC,并使用各种方法,将提高 POEM 在研究和临床实践中的可解释性。

目的

使用分布基础和基于锚定的方法,计算中度至重度特应性皮炎患儿试验数据集 POEM 的最小可检测变化,并估计 POEM 的 MIC。

方法

本研究使用分布基础和基于锚定的方法计算中度至重度湿疹患儿 POEM 的 MIC。

结果

共收集了 300 名儿童的数据。最小可检测变化为 2.13。基于分布基础方法,MIC 估计值为 1.07(使用基线 POEM 评分的 0.2 SD)和 2.68(使用基线 POEM 评分的 0.5 SD);基于患者/家长报告的基于锚定的方法为 3.09-6.13;基于研究者报告的基于锚定的方法为 3.23-5.38。

结论

我们建议使用以下阈值来解释 POEM 评分的变化:≤2,不太可能是超出测量误差的变化;2.1-2.9,检测到的较小变化,可能超出测量误差,但可能无临床意义;3-3.9,可能是有临床意义的变化;≥4,很可能是有临床意义的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be7/6001667/13175bed1604/BJD-178-1135-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be7/6001667/3e19c27f5867/BJD-178-1135-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be7/6001667/13175bed1604/BJD-178-1135-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be7/6001667/3e19c27f5867/BJD-178-1135-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be7/6001667/13175bed1604/BJD-178-1135-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How should minimally important change scores for the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure be interpreted? A validation using varied methods.患者导向湿疹量表的最小重要变化分数应如何解释?使用不同方法进行验证。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 May;178(5):1135-1142. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16367. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
2
The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure: estimating the minimal important change in an outpatient clinic cohort.以患者为导向的湿疹测量:评估门诊队列中的最小重要变化。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):1273-1279. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16122. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
3
The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure in young children: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference.幼儿以患者为导向的湿疹测量:反应性和最小临床重要差异
Allergy. 2016 Nov;71(11):1620-1625. doi: 10.1111/all.12942. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
Translating Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) scores into clinical practice by suggesting severity strata derived using anchor-based methods.根据基于锚定的方法得出的严重程度分层建议,将以患者为中心的湿疹量表 (POEM) 评分转化为临床实践。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Dec;169(6):1326-32. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12590.
5
Emollient bath additives for the treatment of childhood eczema (BATHE): multicentre pragmatic parallel group randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost effectiveness.保湿浴添加剂治疗儿童湿疹(BATHE):多中心实用平行组随机对照临床试验的临床和成本效益。
BMJ. 2018 May 3;361:k1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1332.
6
Definition of Clinically Meaningful Within-Patient Changes in POEM and CDLQI in Children 6 to 11 Years of Age with Severe Atopic Dermatitis.6至11岁重度特应性皮炎儿童中,POEM和CDLQI具有临床意义的患者内变化的定义。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1415-1422. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00543-7. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Determining the minimal important change of the recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) instrument in clinical trials.确定临床试验中特应性皮炎回顾(RECAP)工具的最小重要变化。
Skin Health Dis. 2024 Oct 26;4(6):e470. doi: 10.1002/ski2.470. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Educational and psychological interventions for managing atopic dermatitis (eczema).管理特应性皮炎(湿疹)的教育和心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 12;8(8):CD014932. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014932.pub2.
9
Comparison of Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure and Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis vs Eczema Area and Severity Index and other measures of atopic dermatitis: A validation study.患者导向湿疹量表与患者导向特应性皮炎评分与湿疹面积和严重程度指数及其他特应性皮炎衡量指标的比较:验证研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Jul;125(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
10
Comparison of patient (POEM), observer (EASI, SASSAD, TIS) and corneometry measures of emollient effectiveness in children with eczema: findings from the COMET feasibility trial.比较患者(POEM)、观察者(EASI、SASSAD、TIS)和角膜测量仪在儿童湿疹中保湿剂有效性的测量结果:来自 COMET 可行性试验的结果。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Aug;179(2):362-370. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16475. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Tralokinumab Pre-Filled Pen Improved Atopic Dermatitis Signs and Symptoms and Was Well Tolerated in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 16-Week, Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase 3 Study (INJECZTRA).曲罗芦单抗预充式注射笔改善了中度至重度特应性皮炎成人和青少年的特应性皮炎体征和症状,且耐受性良好:一项为期16周的开放标签、单臂3期研究(INJECZTRA)。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01490-3.
2
Impact of weight on daily activities questionnaire in patients with overweight or obesity: Psychometric evaluation using data from the OASIS 1 trial.体重对超重或肥胖患者日常活动问卷的影响:使用来自OASIS 1试验的数据进行心理测量学评估。
Clin Obes. 2025 Aug;15(4):e70015. doi: 10.1111/cob.70015. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Silk garments plus standard care compared with standard care for treating eczema in children: A randomised, controlled, observer-blind, pragmatic trial (CLOTHES Trial).丝绸衣物加标准护理与标准护理治疗儿童湿疹的比较:一项随机、对照、观察者盲法、实用性试验(衣物试验)。
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 11;14(4):e1002280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002280. eCollection 2017 Apr.
2
The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients.基于接收器操作特征分析或预测建模的锚定最小重要变化,可能需要根据改善患者的比例进行调整。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.015. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
3
The Eczema Bathing Study: Weekly versus daily bathing for people with eczema? Protocol of an online, randomised controlled trial.湿疹沐浴研究:湿疹患者每周沐浴与每日沐浴对比?一项在线随机对照试验方案
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Jan 17;4:63. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13659.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of potent topical corticosteroids versus mild ones in primary care for children with moderate flare-ups of atopic dermatitis; results of a randomised controlled trial.强效局部用皮质类固醇与轻度皮质类固醇在基层医疗中治疗中度特应性皮炎发作儿童的有效性;一项随机对照试验的结果
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e078940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078940.
5
Determining the minimal important change of the recap of atopic eczema (RECAP) instrument in clinical trials.确定临床试验中特应性皮炎回顾(RECAP)工具的最小重要变化。
Skin Health Dis. 2024 Oct 26;4(6):e470. doi: 10.1002/ski2.470. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Mānuka oil based ECMT-154 versus vehicle control for the topical treatment of eczema: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in community pharmacies in Aotearoa New Zealand.基于麦卢卡油的 ECMT-154 与载体对照治疗湿疹的局部治疗:新西兰社区药房中一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04358-9.
7
Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.两种支持湿疹患儿父母/照护者和患儿自我护理的在线干预措施的成本效益比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Sep;25(7):1165-1176. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
8
Brief self-guided digital intervention versus a comprehensive therapist-guided online cognitive behavioural therapy for atopic dermatitis: a trial protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial.简短的自我指导数字干预与全面的治疗师指导在线认知行为疗法治疗特应性皮炎:一项随机非劣效试验的试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e068908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068908.
9
Eczema Care Online behavioural interventions to support self-care for children and young people: two independent, pragmatic, randomised controlled trials.支持儿童和青少年自我护理的湿疹护理在线行为干预:两项独立、实用的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2022 Dec 7;379:e072007. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072007.
10
Do patient characteristics matter when calculating sample size for eczema clinical trials?在计算湿疹临床试验的样本量时,患者特征重要吗?
Skin Health Dis. 2021 May 19;1(3):e42. doi: 10.1002/ski2.42. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Report from the fourth international consensus meeting to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME initiative).
特应性皮炎临床试验协调核心结局指标的第四次国际共识会议报告(HOME 倡议)。
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jul;175(1):69-79. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14773. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Evaluation of the measurement properties of symptom measurement instruments for atopic eczema: a systematic review.特应性皮炎症状测量工具的测量特性评估:系统评价。
Allergy. 2017 Jan;72(1):146-163. doi: 10.1111/all.12959. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
5
The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure in young children: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference.幼儿以患者为导向的湿疹测量:反应性和最小临床重要差异
Allergy. 2016 Nov;71(11):1620-1625. doi: 10.1111/all.12942. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Specifying the target difference in the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial: guidance for researchers.确定随机对照试验主要结局的目标差异:给研究人员的指南。
Trials. 2015 Jan 15;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0526-8.
7
Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis.基于预测模型方法的最小有意义变化 (MIC) 比基于 ROC 分析的 MIC 更精确。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;68(12):1388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
8
Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).临床计量学专栏:深入探讨最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
J Man Manip Ther. 2012 Aug;20(3):160-6. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000001.
9
EASI, (objective) SCORAD and POEM for atopic eczema: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference.EASI、SCORAD 和 POEM 用于特应性皮炎:反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Allergy. 2012 Jan;67(1):99-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02719.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
10
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods.注意 MIC:人群和方法之间存在较大差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):524-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Nov 18.