Suppr超能文献

支持儿童和青少年自我护理的湿疹护理在线行为干预:两项独立、实用的随机对照试验。

Eczema Care Online behavioural interventions to support self-care for children and young people: two independent, pragmatic, randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Santer Miriam, Muller Ingrid, Becque Taeko, Stuart Beth, Hooper Julie, Steele Mary, Wilczynska Sylvia, Sach Tracey H, Ridd Matthew J, Roberts Amanda, Ahmed Amina, Yardley Lucy, Little Paul, Greenwell Kate, Sivyer Katy, Nuttall Jacqui, Griffiths Gareth, Lawton Sandra, Langan Sinéad M, Howells Laura M, Leighton Paul, Williams Hywel C, Thomas Kim S

机构信息

Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK.

Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2022 Dec 7;379:e072007. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of two online behavioural interventions, one for parents and carers and one for young people, to support eczema self-management.

DESIGN

Two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trials.

SETTING

98 general practices in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Parents and carers of children (0-12 years) with eczema (trial 1) and young people (13-25 years) with eczema (trial 2), excluding people with inactive or very mild eczema (≤5 on POEM, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomised (1:1) using online software to receive usual eczema care or an online (www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) behavioural intervention for eczema plus usual care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was eczema symptoms rated using POEM (range 0-28, with 28 being very severe) every four weeks over 24 weeks. Outcomes were reported by parents or carers for children and by self-report for young people. Secondary outcomes included POEM score every four weeks over 52 weeks, quality of life, eczema control, itch intensity (young people only), patient enablement, treatment use, perceived barriers to treatment use, and intervention use. Analyses were carried out separately for the two trials and according to intention-to-treat principles.

RESULTS

340 parents or carers of children (169 usual care; 171 intervention) and 337 young people (169 usual care; 168 intervention) were randomised. The mean baseline POEM score was 12.8 (standard deviation 5.3) for parents and carers and 15.2 (5.4) for young people. Three young people withdrew from follow-up but did not withdraw their data. All randomised participants were included in the analyses. At 24 weeks, follow-up rates were 91.5% (311/340) for parents or carers and 90.2% (304/337) for young people. After controlling for baseline eczema severity and confounders, compared with usual care groups over 24 weeks, eczema severity improved in the intervention groups: mean difference in POEM score -1.5 (95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.6; P=0.002) for parents or carers and -1.9 (-3.0 to -0.8; P<0.001) for young people. The number needed to treat to achieve a 2.5 difference in POEM score at 24 weeks was 6 in both trials. Improvements were sustained to 52 weeks in both trials. Enablement showed a statistically significant difference favouring the intervention group in both trials: adjusted mean difference at 24 weeks -0.7 (95% confidence interval -1.0 to -0.4) for parents or carers and -0.9 (-1.3 to -0.6) for young people. No harms were identified in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Two online interventions for self-management of eczema aimed at parents or carers of children with eczema and at young people with eczema provide a useful, sustained benefit in managing eczema severity in children and young people when offered in addition to usual eczema care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN79282252.

摘要

目的

确定两种在线行为干预措施的效果,一种针对父母及照料者,另一种针对年轻人,以支持湿疹自我管理。

设计

两项独立、实用、平行组、非盲、随机对照试验。

地点

英格兰的98家全科诊所。

参与者

患有湿疹的儿童(0至12岁)的父母及照料者(试验1)和患有湿疹的年轻人(13至25岁)(试验2),不包括湿疹不活跃或非常轻微的人(在患者导向性湿疹量表(POEM)上≤5分)。

干预措施

使用在线软件将参与者随机分为(1:1)两组,一组接受常规湿疹护理,另一组接受针对湿疹的在线行为干预(www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk)加常规护理。

主要结局指标

主要结局是在24周内每四周使用POEM对湿疹症状进行评分(范围0至28分,28分为非常严重)。儿童的结局由父母或照料者报告,年轻人的结局由自我报告。次要结局包括52周内每四周的POEM评分、生活质量、湿疹控制情况、瘙痒强度(仅针对年轻人)、患者能力、治疗使用情况、治疗使用的感知障碍以及干预措施的使用情况。两项试验分别根据意向性分析原则进行分析。

结果

340名儿童的父母或照料者(169名接受常规护理;171名接受干预)和337名年轻人(169名接受常规护理;168名接受干预)被随机分组。父母及照料者的平均基线POEM评分为12.8(标准差5.3),年轻人为15.2(5.4)。三名年轻人退出随访,但未撤回其数据。所有随机分组的参与者均纳入分析。在24周时,父母或照料者的随访率为91.5%(311/340),年轻人为90.2%(304/337)。在控制基线湿疹严重程度和混杂因素后,与常规护理组相比,在24周内干预组的湿疹严重程度有所改善:父母或照料者的POEM评分平均差异为-1.5(95%置信区间-2.5至-0.6;P=0.002),年轻人为-1.9(-3.0至-0.8;P<0.001)。两项试验中,要在24周时使POEM评分达到2.5分的差异所需治疗人数均为6人。两项试验中改善情况均持续至52周。在两项试验中,能力方面干预组均显示出统计学上的显著差异:24周时父母或照料者的调整后平均差异为-0.7(95%置信区间-1.0至-0.4),年轻人为-0.9(-1.3至-0.6)。两组均未发现有害影响。

结论

针对患有湿疹的儿童的父母或照料者以及患有湿疹的年轻人的两种湿疹自我管理在线干预措施,在提供常规湿疹护理的基础上,对儿童和年轻人的湿疹严重程度管理具有有益且持续的益处。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验编号ISRCTN79282252 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/189f/11778922/0fc4202be8f2/sanm072007.f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验