Paul Krishna K, Frey Christian G, Troung Stanley, Paglicawan Laura Vita Q, Cunningham Kathryn A, Preston Hill T, Bothwell Lauren G, Golovko Georgiy, Pillay Yeoshina, Jehle Dietrich
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):869-874. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18569.
As fentanyl has become more readily available, opioid-related morbidity and mortality in the United States has increased dramatically. Preliminary studies suggest that high-affinity, partial mu-opioid receptor agonists such as the combination product buprenorphine-naloxone may reduce mortality from overdose and promote remission. With the escalating prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD), it is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of opioid agonists like buprenorphine-naloxone. This study examines mortality and remission rates for OUD patients prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone to determine the efficacy of this treatment toward these outcomes.
We carried out a retrospective analysis using the US Collaborative Network database in TriNetX, examining de-identified medical records from nearly 92 million patients across 56 healthcare organizations. The study spanned the years from January 1, 2017-May 13, 2022. Cohort 1 included OUD patients who began buprenorphine-naloxone treatment within one-year post-diagnosis, while Cohort 2, the control group, consisted of OUD patients who were not administered buprenorphine. The study measured mortality and remission rates within a year of the index event, incorporating propensity score matching for age, gender, and race/ethnicity.
Prior to propensity matching, we identified a total of 221,967 patients with OUD. Following exclusions, 61,656 patients treated with buprenorphine-naloxone showed 34% fewer deaths within one year of diagnosis compared to 159,061 patients who did not receive buprenorphine (2.6% vs 4.0%; relative risk [RR] 0.661; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.627-0.698; < 0.001). The remission rate was approximately 1.9 times higher in the buprenorphine-naloxone group compared to the control group (18.8% vs 10.1%; RR 1.862; 95% CI 1.812-1.914; < 0.001). After propensity matching, the effect on mortality decreased but remained statistically significant (2.6% vs 3.0%; RR 0.868; 95% CI 0.813-0.927; < 0.001) and the remission rate remained consistent (18.8% vs 10.4%; RR 1.812; 95% CI 1.750-1.876; < 0.001). Number needed to treat for benefit was 249 for death and 12 for remission.
Buprenorphine-naloxone was associated with significantly reduced mortality and increased remission rates for patients with opioid use disorder and should be used as a primary treatment. The recognition and implementation of treatment options like buprenorphine-naloxone is vital in alleviating the impact of OUD.
随着芬太尼的获取变得更加容易,美国与阿片类药物相关的发病率和死亡率急剧上升。初步研究表明,高亲和力的部分μ-阿片受体激动剂,如组合产品丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮,可能降低过量用药死亡率并促进病情缓解。随着阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患病率的不断攀升,评估丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮等阿片类激动剂的有效性至关重要。本研究调查了开具丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮处方的OUD患者的死亡率和缓解率,以确定这种治疗方法对这些结果的疗效。
我们使用TriNetX中的美国协作网络数据库进行了一项回顾性分析,检查了来自56个医疗机构的近9200万患者的去识别化医疗记录。该研究涵盖了2017年1月1日至2022年5月13日期间。队列1包括在诊断后一年内开始丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗的OUD患者,而队列2(对照组)由未接受丁丙诺啡治疗的OUD患者组成。该研究测量了索引事件一年内的死亡率和缓解率,并对年龄、性别和种族/民族进行了倾向得分匹配。
在倾向匹配之前,我们共识别出221967例OUD患者。排除后,61656例接受丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗的患者在诊断后一年内的死亡人数比159061例未接受丁丙诺啡治疗的患者少34%(2.6%对4.0%;相对风险[RR]0.661;95%置信区间[CI]0.627-0.698;<0.001)。丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮组的缓解率比对照组高约1.9倍(18.8%对10.1%;RR1.862;95%CI1.812-1.914;<0.001)。倾向匹配后,对死亡率的影响有所降低,但仍具有统计学意义(2.6%对3.0%;RR0.868;95%CI0.81