Carneiro Márcia Mendonca, Koga Caio Nobuyoshi, Mussi Marcela Chagas Lima, Fradico Pollyanna Faria, Carneiro Marisa Mendonça
Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024 Dec 2;28(4):678-682. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240081.
To use hashtag and content analysis to determine the prevalence, authorship, and types of fertility-related and oncofertility information shared on Instagram in Brazil.
Eleven fertility-related hashtags were chosen according to https://www.tagsfinder.com/: #infertility, #ivf, #endometriosis, #tryingotconceive, #maternity, #humanreproduction, #pregnancy, #invitrofertilization, #assistedreproduction, #pregnant, #difficulttogetpregnant. For oncofertility, the hashtags were #cancerandpregnancy, #oocytecryopreservation), #oncofertility, and #fertilitypreservation. Posts receiving over 20 comments in March 2021 were analyzed for topic and content. They were divided into six categories (educational, patient experience, outreach, emotional, social support, and coping mechanisms) before being analyzed by three authors. Authorship was divided into healthcare professionals (HCP) and lay people (LP). Posts not written in Brazilian Portuguese, videos, reposts of another account, and commercial posts were excluded.
A total of 220 posts with fertility-related terms were analyzed. HCP accounted for 52% (n=114) and LP for 48% (n=106). Most HCP posts were made by medical doctors (n=78; 68.4%) and fertility clinics (n=27; 23.6%). Authorship analysis (HCP vs. LP) for each hashtag was as follows: #infertility (35% vs. 65%), #ivf (35% vs. 65%), #endometriosis (45% vs. 55%), #tryingtoconceive (65% vs. 35%), #maternity (LP 100%), #humanreproduction (20% vs. 80%), #pregnancy (95% vs. 5%), #invitrofertilization (50% vs. 50%), #assistedreproduction (5% vs. 95%), #pregnant (85% vs. 15%), #difficulttogetpregnant (5% vs. 95%). The category breakdown was as follows: 39% educational, 19% emotional, 16% social support, 13% patient experience, 9% coping, and 4% outreach. A total of 98 posts with #oncofertility were retrieved. Most (77.5%; n=62) were written by HCP. They fell into the following categories: 55% educational, 15% patient experience, 12.5% emotional, 11.2% support, and 3.2% coping.
Both HCP and LP write about major fertility topics on Instagram. Oncofertility appears to gain less attention. In Brazil, educational content, followed by emotional content, prevails on Instagram.
运用主题标签和内容分析法,确定巴西Instagram上分享的生育相关及肿瘤生育信息的流行程度、作者身份和类型。
共分析了220条包含生育相关术语的帖子。医疗保健专业人员占52%(n = 114),普通民众占48%(n = 106)。大多数医疗保健专业人员的帖子由医生发布(n = 78;68.4%)和生育诊所发布(n = 27;23.6%)。每个主题标签的作者身份分析(医疗保健专业人员与普通民众)如下:#不孕不育(35%对65%)、#试管婴儿(35%对65%)、#子宫内膜异位症(45%对55%)、#备孕(65%对35%)、#孕产(普通民众100%)、#人类生殖(20%对80%)、#怀孕(95%对5%)、#体外受精(50%对50%)、#辅助生殖(5%对95%)、#已怀孕(85%对15%)、#难怀孕(5%对95%)。类别划分如下:39%为教育类,19%为情感类,16%为社会支持类,13%为患者经历类,9%为应对类,4%为宣传推广类。共检索到98条带有#肿瘤生育的帖子。大多数(77.5%;n = 62)由医疗保健专业人员撰写。它们分为以下几类:55%为教育类,15%为患者经历类,12.5%为情感类,11.2%为支持类,3.2%为应对类。
医疗保健专业人员和普通民众都在Instagram上撰写关于主要生育主题的内容。肿瘤生育似乎受到的关注较少。在巴西,Instagram上教育内容占主导,其次是情感内容。