Farmer Isabelle, Nelson Paige M, Göksun Tilbe, Demir-Lira Ö Ece
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52245, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52245, USA; Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52245, USA; DeLTA Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52245, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2025 Mar;251:106128. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106128. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Verbal and nonverbal skills significantly contribute to individual differences in children's numerical development at the group level. However, less is known about whether the nature of the relations between verbal and nonverbal systems and numerical cognition varies depending on the unique characteristics children bring into numerical learning. To better delineate these associations, we examined the association between verbal and nonverbal skills and symbolic numerical development in preterm-born (PTB; n = 93; <37 weeks of gestation) children and term-born children (n = 104). We showed that PTB preschoolers, as a group, were at a higher risk of falling behind on certain numerical tasks (cardinality) but not on others (counting). There was, however, significant individual variability within the groups. Verbal and nonverbal skills contributed to the variability of children's numerical performance but did so differentially across the full spectrum of gestational age. Specifically, verbal skills moderated the association between gestational age and symbolic number performance (cardinality). The relation between verbal and cardinality skills was stronger at higher gestational ages compared with lower gestational ages. In addition, at higher gestational ages, children more frequently used retrieval strategy and less often relied solely on finger counting for the cardinality task. Shifting the focus from group differences to understanding individuals and their unique developmental pathways may enhance our insight into the risk and protective factors underlying the variability observed in all children.
在群体层面,语言和非语言技能对儿童数字发展的个体差异有显著影响。然而,对于语言和非语言系统与数字认知之间关系的本质是否因儿童带入数字学习的独特特征而异,我们了解得较少。为了更好地描述这些关联,我们研究了早产(PTB;n = 93;妊娠<37周)儿童和足月儿(n = 104)的语言和非语言技能与符号数字发展之间的关联。我们发现,作为一个群体,PTB学龄前儿童在某些数字任务(基数)上落后的风险较高,但在其他任务(计数)上则不然。然而,各群体内部存在显著的个体差异。语言和非语言技能导致了儿童数字表现的差异,但在整个孕周范围内的影响方式有所不同。具体而言,语言技能调节了孕周与符号数字表现(基数)之间的关联。与较低孕周相比,在较高孕周时,语言和基数技能之间的关系更强。此外,在较高孕周时,儿童在基数任务中更频繁地使用检索策略,而较少仅依赖手指计数。将关注点从群体差异转移到理解个体及其独特的发展路径,可能会增强我们对所有儿童中观察到的差异背后的风险和保护因素的洞察。