Egeli Tufan, Çavdaroğlu Özgür, Ağalar Cihan, Derici Serhan, Aksoy Süleyman, Yılmaz İnan, Çevlik Ali Durubey, Bişgin Tayfun, Manoğlu Berke, Özbilgin Mücahit, Ünek Tarkan
Department of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.
Turk J Surg. 2024 Jun 28;40(2):161-167. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6476. eCollection 2024 Jun.
The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical treatment methods and outcomes of difficult duodenal defects due to perforation.
Data of patients who had undergone surgery for difficult duodenal defect between January 2012 and November 2022 were collected. Duodenal defect size of 2 cm or more was defined as difficult duodenal defect. Characteristics of the patients, the etiology of perforation, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), surgical treatment, need for re-operation, and morbidity and mortality were evaluated.
Nineteen patients were detected. Etiology was peptic ulcer perforation in 12 (63.1%) patients, aortaduodenal fistula in 2 (10.5%), tumor implant in 2 (10.5%), cholecystoduodenal fistula in 1 (5.2%), endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) in 1 (5.2%), and cholecystectomy related injury in 1 (5.2%) patient. The first surgical procedure was duodenoraphy + omentopexy in 8 (42.1%), Graham repair in 5 (26.3%), duodenal segment 3-4 resection and Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 4 (21.0%), Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 1 (0.5%), and 1 (0.5%) subtotal gastrectomy + duodenum 1 part resection + Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy, cholecystectomy and external biliary drainage via cystic duct. Four patients who had previously undergone Graham repair (3) and duodenoraphy + omentopexy (1) required salvage surgery. As a salvage surgery; 1 end-to-side and 3 side-to-side Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomies were performed. Overall, mortality occurred in 6 (31.6%) patients. High ASA score and MPI were considered as significant risk factors for mortality (p= 0.015, p= 0.002).
Primary repair techniques can be used in the surgical treatment of difficult duodenal defects when peritonitis is not severe and tensionfree repair is possible. Otherwise, duodenojejunostomy may be preferred as a fast, easy, and safe technique for both initial and salvage surgeries.
本研究旨在探讨因穿孔导致的困难十二指肠缺损的手术治疗方法及疗效。
收集2012年1月至2022年11月期间接受困难十二指肠缺损手术患者的数据。十二指肠缺损大小达2厘米或以上被定义为困难十二指肠缺损。对患者的特征、穿孔病因、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、曼海姆腹膜炎指数(MPI)、手术治疗、再次手术需求以及发病率和死亡率进行评估。
共检测出19例患者。病因包括消化性溃疡穿孔12例(63.1%)、主动脉十二指肠瘘2例(10.5%)、肿瘤种植2例(10.5%)、胆囊十二指肠瘘1例(5.2%)、内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)相关1例(5.2%)、胆囊切除术相关损伤1例(5.2%)。首次手术方式为十二指肠修补术+网膜固定术8例(42.1%)、格雷厄姆修补术5例(26.3%)、十二指肠3-4段切除术及Roux-en-Y端端十二指肠空肠吻合术4例(21.0%)、Roux-en-Y端端十二指肠空肠吻合术1例(0.5%)、1例次全胃切除术+十二指肠第1部切除术+Roux-en-Y胃肠吻合术、胆囊切除术及经胆囊管外引流术1例(0.5%)。4例曾接受格雷厄姆修补术(3例)和十二指肠修补术+网膜固定术(1例)的患者需要挽救性手术。作为挽救性手术,实施了1例端端和3例端侧Roux-en-Y十二指肠空肠吻合术。总体而言,6例(31.6%)患者死亡。高ASA评分和MPI被视为死亡的显著危险因素(p=0.015,p=0.002)。
当腹膜炎不严重且可进行无张力修补时,可采用一期修补技术治疗困难十二指肠缺损。否则,十二指肠空肠吻合术可能是初次手术和挽救性手术中一种快速、简便且安全的技术。