Gifty D, Cherian Nidhi E, Raj S L Arathy, Yenuberi Hilda G, Rathore Swati, Mathews Jiji E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Oct;13(10):4499-4504. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_221_24. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
Over-medicalization of normal pregnancy is associated with unnecessary inductions of labor leading to operative deliveries. In a busy outpatient department (OPD) or low-resource setup where ultrasound availability, experience, and cost will be a concern, routine ultrasound at term can be avoided if the clinical estimation of fetal weight is more or less equal to the actual birth weight.
To assess the reliability and validity of fetal weight estimation at term by ultrasound and clinical estimation.
A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy was done over a period of 1.5 years in a tertiary hospital, which included 100 women with term singleton pregnancies admitted in obstetric wards or labor room.
To find out the agreement between actual birthweight and ultrasound fetal weight interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Mean difference plots (Bland-Altman plots) were done. The mean percentage error was compared with the consultant estimate and registrar estimate across groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values by clinical and ultrasound estimate were calculated for actual birth weight ≤ 2.5 kg.
Both methods of fetal weight estimation have moderate reliability in predicting the actual birth weight. The sensitivity of identifying birthweight < 2.5 kg babies by ultrasound was slightly higher. For birth weight less than 2.5 kg, there was an overestimation of fetal weight by clinical estimation done by postgraduate with mean percentage error being statistically significant as compared with ultrasound estimation.
In a developing country like ours where ultrasound is not readily available in all healthcare setups, the clinical method is an easy, cost-effective, simple one that can be used by all medical professionals after adequate training.
正常妊娠的过度医疗化与不必要的引产有关,进而导致手术分娩。在繁忙的门诊部(OPD)或资源匮乏的环境中,超声设备的可用性、经验和成本都会成为问题,如果胎儿体重的临床估计与实际出生体重大致相等,那么足月时的常规超声检查是可以避免的。
评估超声和临床估计在足月时胎儿体重估计的可靠性和有效性。
在一家三级医院进行了为期1.5年的前瞻性诊断准确性研究,其中包括100名单胎足月妊娠的妇女,她们被收治在产科病房或产房。
采用组内相关系数(ICC)来确定实际出生体重与超声估计胎儿体重之间的一致性。绘制了平均差异图(Bland-Altman图)。比较了各组平均百分比误差与顾问估计值和住院医生估计值。计算了实际出生体重≤2.5kg时临床和超声估计的敏感性、特异性和预测值。
两种胎儿体重估计方法在预测实际出生体重方面都具有中等可靠性。超声识别出生体重<2.5kg婴儿的敏感性略高。对于出生体重小于2.5kg的情况,研究生进行的临床估计存在胎儿体重高估,平均百分比误差与超声估计相比具有统计学意义。
在我们这样的发展中国家,并非所有医疗机构都能轻易获得超声设备,临床方法简单易行、成本效益高,经过充分培训后所有医学专业人员都可以使用。