Lindenberg J A, Newcomb J D
Am J Dis Child. 1986 May;140(5):466-70. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1986.02140190076030.
Infants who have almost died of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and infants who are siblings of SIDS victims constitute groups at increased risk for SIDS. Management dilemmas are common among physicians caring for these infants. To assess the usefulness of hypoxia (17% oxygen) and hypercapnea (3% carbon dioxide) challenge tests as predictors of outcome, we reviewed the records of 102 infants who underwent these tests. During hypoxia tests, we found that periodic breathing and respiratory pauses frequently developed among the infants in these high-risk groups, but also developed among control infants. During hypercapnea testing, some infants failed to increase their minute ventilation (usually measured by volume of breath X breaths per minute), but control infants showed this poor response just as often as high-risk infants. Our findings suggest that hypoxia and hypercapnea stress tests are of limited usefulness in planning management of infants at risk for SIDS.
曾险些死于婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的婴儿以及SIDS受害者的兄弟姐妹构成了SIDS风险增加的群体。在照料这些婴儿的医生中,管理难题很常见。为了评估低氧(17%氧气)和高碳酸血症(3%二氧化碳)激发试验作为预后预测指标的有用性,我们回顾了102名接受这些试验的婴儿的记录。在低氧试验期间,我们发现这些高危组婴儿中经常出现周期性呼吸和呼吸暂停,但对照组婴儿中也会出现。在高碳酸血症试验期间,一些婴儿未能增加其分钟通气量(通常通过每次呼吸量×每分钟呼吸次数来测量),但对照组婴儿出现这种不良反应的频率与高危婴儿一样高。我们的研究结果表明,低氧和高碳酸血症应激试验在规划SIDS风险婴儿的管理方面作用有限。