Khanal Gayatri, Selvamani Y, Ghimire Sushmita, Thapa Suman, Dhital Rolina
SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Asian College for Advance Studies, Satdobato, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2025 Jan;103:104331. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104331. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
Inspite of high prevalence of mental illness in developing countries, access to health care for addressing mental health issues has several existing barriers at different levels leading to disproportionate adverse health outcomes, summarised as the three Ds of death, disability, and health-economic deficit. This study aims at examining the perspectives of patients with mental illness on barriers to access mental care.
In this study, we searched EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and PsycNet databases. Database search examined qualitative articles on barriers to access mental health care published from January, 2013 to January, 2023. Papers appropriate for inclusion were selected in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) nations, employed qualitative methodologies, and focused on patients, caregiver, or healthcare practitioners' perspective on challenges to access care. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) - Version 2018 was used to assess quality.
Out of 351 papers, only 24 met the inclusion requirements. A multilevel conceptual framework guided the reporting of emergent themes. Patient with mental disorder experienced four levels of barriers while receiving mental health services: 1. sociocultural (family support, community support networks, and cultural attitudes), 2. organizational (organizational characteristics, service access, and inadequacy of resources), 3. structural (poor implementation of existing policy) and 4. individual levels (knowledge, attitudes, and individual characteristics).
Complex, interlinked, multilevel barriers existed while accessing MHS for patient in SAARC nations. To improve access to MHS, multilevel solutions ought to tackle individual, organizational, societal, and structural barriers at various phases of the care pathway is imperative.
尽管发展中国家精神疾病的患病率很高,但在不同层面上,获得解决心理健康问题的医疗保健存在若干现有障碍,导致了不成比例的不良健康后果,概括为死亡、残疾和健康经济赤字这三个“D”。本研究旨在探讨精神疾病患者对获得心理护理障碍的看法。
在本研究中,我们检索了EMBASE、PubMed、Scopus和PsycNet数据库。数据库检索考察了2013年1月至2023年1月发表的关于获得心理健康护理障碍的定性文章。在南亚区域合作联盟(SAARC)国家中,选取适合纳入的论文,采用定性方法,并关注患者、护理人员或医疗从业者对获得护理挑战的看法。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)-2018版来评估质量。
在351篇论文中,只有24篇符合纳入要求。一个多层次概念框架指导了新出现主题的报告。患有精神障碍的患者在接受心理健康服务时经历了四个层面的障碍:1. 社会文化层面(家庭支持、社区支持网络和文化态度),2. 组织层面(组织特征、服务可及性和资源不足),3. 结构层面(现有政策执行不力)和4. 个人层面(知识、态度和个人特征)。
在SAARC国家,患者在获得精神卫生服务时存在复杂、相互关联的多层次障碍。为了改善精神卫生服务的可及性,必须在护理途径的各个阶段采取多层次解决方案,以应对个人、组织、社会和结构层面的障碍。