Suppr超能文献

痴呆症患者护理伙伴的个性化协调与赋权(ICECaP):可行性与可接受性

Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia (ICECaP): Feasibility and acceptability.

作者信息

Thompson Ryan C, Gallagher Virginia T, Reilly Shannon E, Arp Anna M, Manning Carol A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jan;148:107770. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107770. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informal care partners (CPs) of persons with dementia (PWDs), who are at risk of negative health outcomes, benefit from psychosocial interventions. Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for CPs of PWDs (ICECaP) is a year-long, multi-component intervention comprised of in-person and telehealth psychoeducation and emotional support from dementia care coordinators (DCCs). ICECaP feasibility and acceptability were examined during a pilot randomized controlled trial.

METHOD

Feasibility was determined by study enrollment (relative to screening) and study completion. Acceptability was examined with CP-rated intervention satisfaction and DCC-completed surveys of CP engagement, using one-sample Wilcoxon tests to evaluate differences between observed and null hypothesized medians. Implementation fidelity was also evaluated. Analyses of variance and Chi-square tests identified demographic differences in study completion and DCC-reported CP engagement.

RESULTS

Study enrollment (91.4 %) and study completion (85.4 %) were both high when compared to findings from a recent meta-analysis of CP psychosocial interventions. Completion was similar across groups (ICECaP vs. control) and demographics. CPs and DCCs communicated twice monthly, most commonly via email. On average, DCCs spent 68 minutes total per CP monthly; the number and duration of contacts varied widely. CPs responded positively on the satisfaction survey, and DCCs mostly responded positively about CP communication, engagement, and responsiveness. Communication was reportedly more difficult with employed CPs and CPs with ≥16 years of education.

CONCLUSION

ICECaP was both feasible and acceptable. DCC time spent with CPs occurred primarily virtually and varied widely, reflecting both individualization within the intervention and the unpredictability of dementia care for CPs.

CLINICALTRIALS

govNCT04495686.

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者(PWDs)的非正式护理伙伴(CPs)面临负面健康结果的风险,心理社会干预对他们有益。痴呆症患者护理伙伴的个性化协调与赋权(ICECaP)是一项为期一年的多成分干预措施,包括面对面和远程健康心理教育以及痴呆症护理协调员(DCCs)提供的情感支持。在一项试点随机对照试验中对ICECaP的可行性和可接受性进行了研究。

方法

通过研究入组(相对于筛查)和研究完成情况来确定可行性。通过护理伙伴评定的干预满意度和护理协调员完成的护理伙伴参与度调查来检查可接受性,使用单样本Wilcoxon检验来评估观察到的中位数与假设的零中位数之间的差异。还评估了实施保真度。方差分析和卡方检验确定了研究完成情况和护理协调员报告的护理伙伴参与度方面的人口统计学差异。

结果

与最近一项关于护理伙伴心理社会干预的荟萃分析结果相比,研究入组率(91.4%)和研究完成率(85.4%)都很高。各组(ICECaP组与对照组)和不同人口统计学特征的完成率相似。护理伙伴和护理协调员每月沟通两次,最常见的方式是电子邮件。平均而言,护理协调员每月为每位护理伙伴总共花费68分钟;联系的次数和时长差异很大。护理伙伴在满意度调查中给出了积极回应,护理协调员对护理伙伴的沟通、参与度和反应能力大多也给出了积极回应。据报告,与在职护理伙伴以及受教育年限≥16年的护理伙伴沟通更困难。

结论

ICECaP既可行又可接受。护理协调员与护理伙伴相处的时间主要通过虚拟方式进行,且差异很大,这既反映了干预措施中的个性化,也反映了护理伙伴痴呆症护理工作的不可预测性。

临床试验

govNCT04495686

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验