Center on Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e521-e534. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz015.
Family caregiving stress has been widely reported to have negative effects on circulating biomarkers of immune system function and inflammation. Our goals were to systematically review this literature and conduct a meta-analysis on the extracted effects.
A systematic search of published studies comparing caregivers and noncaregivers on biomarkers measured from blood samples was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. This search identified 2,582 articles and abstracts. After removing duplicative papers and studies not meeting inclusion criteria, 30 articles were identified that reported analyses on 86 relevant biomarkers from 1,848 caregivers and 3,640 noncaregivers.
Random-effects models revealed an overall effect size across all biomarkers of 0.164 SD units (d). A slightly larger overall effect (d = 0.188) was found for dementia caregivers only. Immune system comparisons yielded somewhat larger differences than inflammation comparisons. Most studies used small convenience samples, and effect sizes were larger for studies with moderate or high bias ratings than for studies with low bias ratings. No significant associations were found in studies that used population-based samples.
Caregivers had small but significantly reduced immune system functioning and greater inflammation than noncaregivers, but associations were generally weak and of questionable clinical significance. The absence of clear associations from low bias studies and population-based studies underscores concerns with possible selection biases in many of the convenience samples. Population-based studies that assess biomarkers before and after the onset of caregiving might add much clarity to this literature.
家庭护理压力对免疫系统功能和炎症的循环生物标志物有负面影响,这一现象已被广泛报道。我们的目标是系统地回顾这一文献,并对提取的影响进行荟萃分析。
我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行了系统搜索,以比较有和无护理者的血液样本中生物标志物的研究。该搜索共确定了 2582 篇文章和摘要。在排除重复论文和不符合纳入标准的研究后,确定了 30 篇报告了 1848 名护理者和 3640 名非护理者 86 个相关生物标志物分析结果的文章。
随机效应模型显示,所有生物标志物的总体效应大小为 0.164 个标准差单位(d)。仅痴呆症护理者的总体效应稍大(d = 0.188)。与炎症相比,免疫系统的比较产生了稍大的差异。大多数研究使用小的方便样本,且具有中度或高度偏倚评分的研究的效应大小大于具有低度偏倚评分的研究。在使用基于人群的样本的研究中,未发现显著关联。
与非护理者相比,护理者的免疫系统功能略有但显著降低,炎症水平更高,但关联通常较弱,且具有临床意义的疑问。低偏倚研究和基于人群的研究中没有明确的关联,这突出了许多方便样本中可能存在选择偏倚的问题。在护理开始之前和之后评估生物标志物的基于人群的研究可能会使这一文献更加清晰。