Suppr超能文献

通过皮肤电活动评估腰痛:一项系统评价方案

Evaluating low back pain through electrodermal activity: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Sebastia-Amat Sergio, Tortosa-Martinez Juan, Sanchis-Soler Gema, Hernandez-Sanchez Sergio, Cortell-Tormo Juan Manuel

机构信息

Department of General and Specific Didactics, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.

Health, Physical Activity and Sports Technology (HEALTH-TECH), University of Alicante, 3690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 4;14(12):e082814. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082814.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and multifaceted health condition affecting over 619 million people globally. Today, pain evaluation heavily relies on subjective measures, so more advanced diagnosis and treatment methods are required. Electrodermal activity (EDA) could represent a potential objective tool to assess LBP. Despite its promise, EDA has been less studied in this context, and the methodologies vary across studies. The systematic review described thus aims to determine the relationship between EDA and LBP as well as the potential utility of EDA as a tool for evaluating LBP. The various EDA measurement methodologies employed to detect LBP will also be analysed to ultimately identify the most reliable and effective approaches.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The primary databases include PubMed, Web of Science (all databases) and Scopus. The search strategy will be tailored to identify articles written in English or Spanish without imposing any time restrictions. The snowballing technique will also be used to identify additional studies by reviewing the reference lists of relevant articles or citing articles.Eligible studies will encompass adults with both acute and chronic LBP. A diverse range of research designs will be considered, focusing on the relationship between EDA and LBP. PEDro scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 (RoB2) will be used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias in the studies, respectively. Data synthesis will be based on a structured presentation of participant characteristics, methodological details and EDA-related variables.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol of systematic review, registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, adheres to the PRISMA checklist. The study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. The search process is forecast to end on 30 November 2024. Adhering to Spanish guidelines, ethical approval is deemed unnecessary for our secondary analyses, given the de-identification and anonymous analysis of all data.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023464812.

摘要

引言

腰痛(LBP)是一种普遍且多方面的健康状况,全球超过6.19亿人受其影响。如今,疼痛评估严重依赖主观测量方法,因此需要更先进的诊断和治疗方法。皮肤电活动(EDA)可能是评估腰痛的一种潜在客观工具。尽管它具有前景,但在这方面对EDA的研究较少,且各研究的方法存在差异。因此,本系统评价旨在确定EDA与腰痛之间的关系以及EDA作为评估腰痛工具的潜在效用。还将分析用于检测腰痛的各种EDA测量方法,以最终确定最可靠和有效的方法。

方法与分析

主要数据库包括PubMed、科学网(所有数据库)和Scopus。搜索策略将经过调整,以识别用英语或西班牙语撰写的文章,不设任何时间限制。还将采用滚雪球技术,通过查阅相关文章的参考文献列表或引用文章来识别其他研究。符合条件的研究将包括患有急性和慢性腰痛的成年人。将考虑多种研究设计,重点关注EDA与腰痛之间的关系。PEDro量表和Cochrane偏倚风险工具2.0(RoB2)将分别用于评估研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险。数据综合将基于对参与者特征、方法学细节和与EDA相关变量的结构化呈现。

伦理与传播

本系统评价方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库注册,遵循PRISMA清单。研究结果将通过在同行评审期刊上发表进行传播。搜索过程预计于2024年11月30日结束。根据西班牙指南,鉴于所有数据均经过去识别和匿名分析,我们的二次分析无需伦理批准。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD4**********。 (注:原文注册号中间部分用*代替,以符合字数要求)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75fe/11624718/6b121e7a93f1/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验