Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛门诊患者的客观疼痛评分。

An Objective Pain Score for Chronic Pain Clinic Patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2021 Feb 8;2021:6695741. doi: 10.1155/2021/6695741. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although numerous studies have looked at the numeric rating scale (NRS) in chronic pain patients and several studies have evaluated objective pain scales, no known studies have assessed an objective pain scale for use in the evaluation of adult chronic pain patients in the outpatient setting. Subjective scales require patients to convert a subjective feeling into a quantitative number. Meanwhile, objective pain scales utilize, for the most part, the patient's behavioral component as observed by the provider in addition to the patient's subjective perception of pain. This study aims to examine the reliability and validity of an objective Chronic Pain Behavioral Pain Scale for Adults (CBPS) as compared to the traditional NRS.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients were assessed before and after an interventional pain procedure by a researcher and a nurse using the CBPS and the NRS. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability revealed a fair-good agreement between the nurse's and researcher's CBPS scores, weighted kappa values of 0.59 and 0.65, preprocedure and postprocedure, respectively. Concurrent validity showed low positive correlation for the preprocedure measurements, 0.34 (95% CI 0.16-0.50) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.61), and moderate positive correlation for the postprocedure measurements, 0.68 (95% CI 0.56-0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.55-0.77), for the nurses and researchers, respectively. Construct validity demonstrated an equally average significant reduction in pain from preprocedure to postprocedure, CBPS and NRS median (IQR) scores preprocedure (4 (2-6) and 6 (4-8)) and postprocedure (1 (0-2) and 3 (0-5)), < 0.001. . The CBPS has been shown to have interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and construct validity. However, further testing is needed to show its potential benefits over other pain scales and its effectiveness in treating patients with chronic pain over a long-term. This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov with National Clinical Trial Number NCT02882971.

摘要

目的

虽然有许多研究关注慢性疼痛患者的数字评分量表(NRS),并且有几项研究评估了客观疼痛量表,但目前还没有研究评估用于评估门诊成人慢性疼痛患者的客观疼痛量表。主观量表要求患者将主观感觉转换为定量数字。同时,客观疼痛量表主要利用提供者观察到的患者的行为成分,以及患者对疼痛的主观感知。本研究旨在检查客观慢性疼痛行为疼痛成人量表(CBPS)与传统 NRS 的可靠性和有效性。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,患者在介入性疼痛治疗前后由研究人员和护士使用 CBPS 和 NRS 进行评估。分析了评分者间信度、同时效度和结构效度。

结果

评分者间信度显示,护士和研究人员的 CBPS 评分之间存在良好的一致性,加权 kappa 值分别为 0.59 和 0.65,分别为术前和术后。同时效度显示,术前测量的相关性较低,为 0.34(95%CI 0.16-0.50)和 0.47(95%CI 0.31-0.61),术后测量的相关性中度较高,分别为 0.68(95%CI 0.56-0.77)和 0.67(95%CI 0.55-0.77),护士和研究人员。结构效度显示,从术前到术后,疼痛均有明显减轻,CBPS 和 NRS 的中位数(IQR)评分术前(4(2-6)和 6(4-8))和术后(1(0-2)和 3(0-5)),<0.001。CBPS 已被证明具有评分者间信度、同时效度和结构效度。然而,需要进一步的测试来显示其相对于其他疼痛量表的潜在优势及其在长期治疗慢性疼痛患者方面的有效性。本研究在 ClinicalTrial.gov 上注册,注册号为 NCT02882971。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af28/7884155/aeee7524823e/PRM2021-6695741.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验