• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医学住院医师反思技能评估

Evaluation of family medicine residents' reflection skills.

作者信息

Gürel Özge, Demirören Meral, Taşdelen Teker Gülşen

机构信息

Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Health Sciences University Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):1417. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06404-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06404-z
PMID:39633393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11616365/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While reflection skills have been extensively studied in undergraduate medical education, research on the reflection skills of residents remains limited in the Turkish literature. Therefore, a two-phase study was conducted. In the first phase, a methodological study adapted the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale (GRAS) for residents. In the second phase, a cross-sectional study assessed the reflection skills of family medicine (FM) residents using the adapted scale, examining reflection ability scores across gender, seniority, and institution type.

METHODS

GRAS has been translated into Turkish. Firstly, the Turkish version was administered to 230 residents from various specialties. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was run, Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients were calculated. Then, the adapted scale was administered to 336 FM residents in Turkey. Skewness and kurtosis coefficients were calculated, and the Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to examine normality. Group comparisons were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

RESULTS

In the first phase, GRAS-TR-pg with 20-item, single-dimension and three-factor structure has been validated for use with Turkish residents. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients were found to be sufficient. In the second phase, there were no significant differences in the scores received, based on various variables.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that the adapted GRAS-TR-pg can serve as a valid and reliable tool to measure the reflective skills of residents in Turkey. No significant differences found based on various variables regarding the reflection skill levels of Turkish FM residents.

摘要

背景

虽然反思技能在本科医学教育中已得到广泛研究,但土耳其文献中关于住院医师反思技能的研究仍然有限。因此,开展了一项分两阶段的研究。在第一阶段,一项方法学研究对住院医师采用了格罗宁根反思能力量表(GRAS)。在第二阶段,一项横断面研究使用改编后的量表评估了家庭医学(FM)住院医师的反思技能,考察了不同性别、资历和机构类型的反思能力得分。

方法

GRAS已被翻译成土耳其语。首先,将土耳其语版本施用于230名来自不同专业的住院医师。进行了验证性因素分析(CFA),计算了克朗巴哈系数和麦克唐纳欧米伽系数。然后,将改编后的量表施用于土耳其的336名FM住院医师。计算了偏度和峰度系数,并应用夏皮罗-威尔克检验来检验正态性。使用曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯H检验进行组间比较。

结果

在第一阶段,具有20个项目、单维度和三因素结构的GRAS-TR-pg已被验证可用于土耳其住院医师。发现克朗巴哈系数和麦克唐纳欧米伽系数是足够的。在第二阶段,基于各种变量,所获得的分数没有显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,改编后的GRAS-TR-pg可作为测量土耳其住院医师反思技能的有效且可靠的工具。在土耳其FM住院医师的反思技能水平方面,基于各种变量未发现显著差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of family medicine residents' reflection skills.家庭医学住院医师反思技能评估
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):1417. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06404-z.
2
Factor Analytic Adaptation Study of the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale (GRAS) in Senior Nursing Students.格罗宁根反思能力量表(GRAS)在高级护理专业学生中的因素分析适应性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Jul;150:106690. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106690. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
3
Psychometric analysis of the Swedish version of the General Medical Council's multi source feedback questionnaires.英国医学总会多源反馈调查问卷瑞典语版本的心理测量分析
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Jul 10;8:252-261. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5948.0bb6.
4
Adaptation of the disease-related apathy scale in adults with epilepsy into Turkish: A methodological study.将成人癫痫患者疾病相关冷漠量表改编为土耳其语:一项方法学研究。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Feb;10(1):210-221. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13094. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
5
Adaptation of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) to Surgical Residents in China.中国外科住院医师沟通技能态度量表的适应性研究。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Mar-Apr;76(2):329-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.027. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Public Stigma of Stroke Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study.中风公众污名量表:土耳其语版的效度与信度研究
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e70003. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70003.
7
Residents' views about family medicine specialty education in Turkey.土耳其居民对家庭医学专业教育的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Apr 15;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-29.
8
Emergency Medicine Resident Self-assessment of Clinical Teaching Compared to Student Evaluation Using a Previously Validated Rubric.急诊住院医师使用先前验证的评分表对临床教学的自我评估与学生评估的比较。
Clin Ther. 2018 Aug;40(8):1375-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
9
Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其语版卫生专业人员沟通技巧量表。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
10
Satisfaction with family life scale: a validity and reliability study in the Turkish context.家庭生活满意度量表:土耳其语语境下的效度和信度研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 27;12(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02037-5.

本文引用的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Group Reflective Practice in Medical Students.医学生群体反思性实践的混合方法系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;11(12):1798. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121798.
2
Validation of the Korean version of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire in clinical clerkship of Korean medical students.验证韩国版反思实践问卷在韩国医学生临床实习中的应用。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Jun;35(2):153-163. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.256. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
3
Medical students' reflective capacity and its role in their critical thinking disposition.医学生的反思能力及其在批判性思维倾向中的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04163-x.
4
Reflective practice in the teaching of communication skills.反思性实践在沟通技巧教学中的应用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2166-2172. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.021. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Reflection as a Learning Tool in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.反思作为毕业后医学教育中的一种学习工具:一项系统综述。
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Aug;9(4):430-439. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00500.1.
6
Learning to See Beneath the Surface: A Qualitative Analysis of Family Medicine Residents' Reflections About Communication.学会洞察表象之下:对家庭医学住院医师关于沟通的反思的定性分析
J Health Commun. 2015;20(12):1441-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018647. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
A validation study of the psychometric properties of the Groningen Reflection Ability Scale.格罗宁根反思能力量表心理测量特性的验证研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 10;14:214. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-214.
8
Family medicine residents' reactions to introducing a reflective exercise into training.家庭医学住院医师对在培训中引入反思性练习的反应。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2013 Sep-Dec;26(3):141-6. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.125987.
9
Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing.促进和评估医学教育中的反思能力:开发 REFLECT 量表评估反思性写作。
Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):41-50. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823b55fa.
10
The effect of monthly resident reflection on achieving rotation goals.住院医师每月反思对实现轮转目标的影响。
Teach Learn Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;21(1):15-9. doi: 10.1080/10401330802384276.