Kader Md Rezaul, Rahman Mohammod Mahmudur, Bristi Piali Dey, Ahmmed Foyez
Department of Statistics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 15;10(22):e40454. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40454. eCollection 2024 Nov 30.
This study aimed to explore the change in mental health service utilization before and after the COVID-19 pandemic as well as determine the association of various sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities on the utilization pattern.
Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2019 and 2022 were explored in this study. Along with the univariate analysis, bivariate analysis was conducted using the Chi-square and Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Stepwise binary logistic regression was implemented to find the best-fitted model and examine the effects of different factors on mental healthcare utilization. We also conducted a subgroup analysis for the variables that showed heterogeneous changes in utilization from 2019 to 2022.
Analysis of a total of 53,856 complete cases showed that the percentage of mental healthcare utilization changed from 20% in 2019 to 23.31% in 2022. Logistic regression results showed that the odds of mental health service utilization in the post-COVID period is 1.41 times of the pre-COVID [95% CI odds ratio (OR) = (1.26, 1.58)]. Sex, age, race, education, income group, insurance coverage, birth country, marital status, limitations of social functioning, having a place for healthcare, symptoms and history of depression/anxiety, diabetes, and hypertension had significant effects on the odds of receiving mental healthcare. Subgroup analysis revealed that the utilization changed significantly from 2019 to 2022 for age group "18-34" [OR = 1.41, 95% CI = (1.26, 1.58)], "35-49" [OR = 1.35, 95% CI = (1.21, 1.50)], and "50-64" [OR = 1.12, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.24)], while for the age group "above 64" was not significant.
Pre- and post-COVID periods were found to be significantly different in terms of the utilization of mental healthcare utilization. Changes in the utilization was also found to differ in terms of different age groups.
本研究旨在探讨新冠疫情前后心理健康服务利用情况的变化,并确定各种社会人口学特征和合并症与利用模式之间的关联。
本研究分析了2019年和2022年美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)的数据。除单变量分析外,还使用卡方检验和 Cochr an-Armitage趋势检验进行了双变量分析。采用逐步二元逻辑回归来寻找最佳拟合模型,并检验不同因素对心理保健利用的影响。我们还对2019年至2022年利用情况显示出异质性变化的变量进行了亚组分析。
对总共53856例完整病例的分析表明,心理保健利用率从2019年的20% 变为2022年的23.31%。逻辑回归结果显示,新冠疫情后心理健康服务利用的几率是疫情前的1.41倍[95%置信区间优势比(OR)=(1.26,1.58)]。性别、年龄、种族、教育程度、收入组、保险覆盖范围、出生国家、婚姻状况、社会功能受限情况、是否有医疗保健场所、抑郁/焦虑症状及病史、糖尿病和高血压对接受心理保健的几率有显著影响。亚组分析显示,年龄组“18 - 34岁”[OR = 1.41,95%置信区间 =(1.26,1.58)]、“35 - 49岁”[OR = 1.35,95%置信区间 =(1.21,1.50)]和“50 - 64岁”[OR = 1.12,95%置信区间 =(1.01,1.24)]的利用率在2019年至2022年有显著变化,而“64岁以上”年龄组则不显著。
发现新冠疫情前后心理保健利用情况存在显著差异。不同年龄组的利用率变化也有所不同。