Ness Roberta B, Pope Thaddeus Mason
Colorado University School of Public Health, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Mitchell Hamline School of Law, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2025 Aug;28(8):1114-1120. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0206. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
To systematically review studies presenting quantitative data on the experiences of patients and providers engaged in VSED. Voluntarily stopping eating and drinking (VSED) to purposefully accelerate the end of life is uncommon but likely accounts for thousands of deaths per year. A single systematic review of literature was published in 2014. We systematically searched English-language articles and books in MEDLINE/PubMed and reference lists of retrieved articles and books. Studies that provided empirical results from surveys or qualitative studies were selected. We obtained from each study publication year, study type, country, population source, sample size, outcomes, and results, and graded each on quality. Of the 17 empirical publications not included in the 2014 review, 3 were conducted in the US. Eight surveys were rated as moderately high/high quality and six as moderately low/low quality. Incidence estimates ranged from 0.4%-1.7% of all deaths. VSED was generally attempted among the elderly, often 80+ year-olds. About half of participants had dementia or other conditions that would make them ineligible for medical aid in dying. Incapacitating depression was rare. The mean time to death was 10 days with a range of one to two weeks. Most experiences were considered satisfactory by the patient. Caregivers often found preparation for and the emotional toll from VSED challenging. Theoretical support for VSED was ubiquitous among health care professionals in Europe, who expressed the importance of palliative support. However, professional experience was lacking. VSED, albeit uncommon, still accounts for many, typically satisfactory, deaths. Little research to guide best practice is available, particularly in the United States. Caregivers and health care providers generally indicate support however, extensive preparation and caregiver assistance make the practice challenging. Practitioners express a need for training.
系统回顾有关参与自愿停止进食和饮水(VSED)的患者及医护人员经历的定量数据研究。通过自愿停止进食和饮水(VSED)来有意加速生命终结的情况并不常见,但每年可能导致数千人死亡。2014年发表了一篇对文献的单一系统综述。我们在MEDLINE/PubMed中系统检索了英文文章和书籍以及检索到的文章和书籍的参考文献列表。选取了提供调查实证结果或定性研究的研究。我们从每项研究中获取了发表年份、研究类型、国家、人群来源、样本量、结局和结果,并对每项研究的质量进行评分。在2014年综述未纳入的17篇实证出版物中,有3篇是在美国进行的。八项调查被评为中等偏高/高质量,六项被评为中等偏低/低质量。发病率估计占所有死亡人数的0.4%-1.7%。VSED通常在老年人中尝试,通常是80岁及以上的老人。约一半的参与者患有痴呆症或其他使他们不符合临终医疗救助条件的疾病。严重抑郁的情况很少见。平均死亡时间为10天,范围为一至两周。大多数患者认为这种经历是令人满意的。护理人员常常发现为VSED做准备以及VSED带来的情感负担具有挑战性。在欧洲,医护人员普遍对VSED给予理论支持,他们表达了姑息支持的重要性。然而,缺乏专业经验。VSED虽然不常见,但仍然导致了许多通常令人满意的死亡。几乎没有可用于指导最佳实践的研究,尤其是在美国。护理人员和医护人员总体上表示支持,然而,大量的准备工作和护理人员的协助使这种做法具有挑战性。从业者表示需要培训。