Mudd Andrea L, Bal Michèlle, Verra Sanne E, Poelman Maartje P, Kamphuis Carlijn B M
Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science- Social Policy and Public Health, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Chair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 5;22(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01248-x.
A complex systems perspective is gaining popularity in research on socioeconomic inequalities in health and health behaviour, though there may be a gap between its popularity and the way it is implemented. Building on our recent systematic scoping review, we aim to analyse the application of and reporting on complex systems methods in the literature on socioeconomic inequalities in health and health behaviour.
Selected methods and results from the review are presented as a basis for in-depth critical reflection. A traffic light-based instrument was used to assess the extent to which eight key concepts of a complex systems perspective (e.g. feedback loops) were applied. Study characteristics related to the applied value of the models were also extracted, including the model evidence base, the depiction of the model structure, and which characteristics of model relationships (e.g. polarity) were reported on.
Studies that applied more key concepts of a complex systems perspective were also more likely to report the direction and polarity of relationships. The system paradigm, its deepest held beliefs, is seldom identified but may be key to recognize when designing interventions. A clear, complete depiction of the full model structure is also needed to convey the functioning of a complex system. We recommend that authors include these characteristics and level of detail in their reporting.
Above all, we call for the development of reporting guidelines to increase the transparency and applied value of complex systems models on socioeconomic inequalities in health, health behaviour and beyond.
尽管复杂系统视角在健康及健康行为的社会经济不平等研究中日益流行,但其受欢迎程度与实施方式之间可能存在差距。基于我们最近的系统综述,我们旨在分析复杂系统方法在健康及健康行为社会经济不平等文献中的应用及报告情况。
展示综述中选定的方法和结果,作为深入批判性反思的基础。使用基于交通信号灯的工具来评估复杂系统视角的八个关键概念(如反馈回路)的应用程度。还提取了与模型应用价值相关的研究特征,包括模型证据基础、模型结构描述以及所报告的模型关系特征(如极性)。
应用复杂系统视角更多关键概念的研究也更有可能报告关系的方向和极性。系统范式及其最深层次的信念很少被识别出来,但在设计干预措施时可能是需要认识到的关键因素。还需要对完整的模型结构进行清晰、完整的描述,以传达复杂系统的功能。我们建议作者在报告中纳入这些特征和详细程度。
最重要的是,我们呼吁制定报告指南,以提高复杂系统模型在健康、健康行为及其他领域社会经济不平等方面的透明度和应用价值。