López Pérez Melanie, Moore Charlotte, Sander-Montant Andrea, Byers-Heinlein Krista
Concordia University, Montréal, Canada.
Infancy. 2025 Jan-Feb;30(1):e12641. doi: 10.1111/infa.12641.
Assessing early vocabulary development commonly involves parent report methods and behavioral tasks like looking-while-listening. While both yield reliable aggregate scores, findings are mixed regarding their reliability in measuring infants' knowledge of individual words. Using archival data from 126 monolingual and bilingual 14-31-month-olds, we further examined links across these methods at the word level, while controlling for potentially confounding child-level factors. When data were averaged at the child level, performance on the looking-while-listening task correlated well with parent-reported word production of the same words, as expected. However, mixed-effects model comparisons suggested that at the word level, looking-while-listening performance was significantly predicted by age and total productive vocabulary, but not by parent-reported knowledge of a word once these factors were controlled for. These findings invite careful consideration regarding the adequacy of these two popular methods for capturing children's idiosyncratic knowledge of individual words.
评估早期词汇发展通常涉及家长报告法和诸如边听边看之类的行为任务。虽然这两种方法都能得出可靠的总体分数,但在衡量婴儿对单个单词的了解程度时,它们的可靠性结果不一。我们使用了来自126名14至31个月大的单语和双语儿童的档案数据,在控制可能产生混淆的儿童层面因素的同时,进一步在单词层面研究了这些方法之间的联系。当在儿童层面进行数据平均时,正如预期的那样,边听边看任务的表现与家长报告的相同单词的词汇产出密切相关。然而,混合效应模型比较表明,在单词层面,一旦控制了年龄和总产出词汇量等因素,边听边看任务的表现主要由年龄和总产出词汇量显著预测,而不是由家长报告的对某个单词的了解程度预测。这些发现促使人们仔细考虑这两种常用方法在捕捉儿童对单个单词的独特了解方面的充分性。