• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑疝中的中脑体积:外伤性脑损伤手术中的体积分析

Midbrain volume in brain herniation: A volumetric analysis in operative traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Lara-Reyna Jacques, Karabacak Mert, Wedderburn Raymond, Legome Eric, Margetis Konstantinos

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, United States.

Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, United States.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Nov 29;15:437. doi: 10.25259/SNI_389_2024. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.25259/SNI_389_2024
PMID:39640336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11618762/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study primarily aimed to assess the volumetric attributes of the midbrain and perimesencephalic structures preoperatively and following surgical interventions in patients diagnosed with brain herniation secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

We evaluated patients based on radiological findings and clinical symptoms indicative of brain herniation. We performed semi-automated segmentation of the intracranial structures most relevant to trauma and of interest for the current study, such as hematoma, ventricles, midbrain, and perimesencephalic cisterns. Using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans, we measured and analyzed the volume of these structures. Patients were grouped based on their discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores: GCS 15 and non-GCS 15.

RESULTS

From May 2018 to February 2020, we included 20 patients in the study. Our volumetric analysis revealed that preoperative midbrain volume (5.84 cc vs. 4.37 cc, = 0.034) was a significant differentiator between GCS 15 and non-GCS 15 groups. Preoperative midbrain volume remained significant in univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.280, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.126-5.929, = 0.04) and multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR = 3.204, 95% CI = 1.228-12.438, = 0.038) even after adjusting for age, sex, and admission GCS score. We identified a cut-off point of 4.86 ccs in preoperative midbrain volume, which demonstrated a discriminatory performance of 0.788 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 80.0% accuracy, 77.8% sensitivity, and 81.8% specificity between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patients presenting with lesser midbrain compression preoperatively tended to have improved clinical outcomes postsurgery. Thus, we propose that this preoperative midbrain volume cut-off point holds predictive value for clinical outcomes within our cohort.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)继发脑疝患者术前及手术干预后脑干和中脑周围结构的容积属性。

方法

我们根据提示脑疝的影像学表现和临床症状对患者进行评估。我们对与创伤最相关且本研究感兴趣的颅内结构进行半自动分割,如血肿、脑室、中脑和中脑周围脑池。利用术前和术后计算机断层扫描,我们测量并分析了这些结构的容积。患者根据出院时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分分组:GCS 15分和非GCS 15分。

结果

从2018年5月至2020年2月,我们纳入了20例患者进行研究。我们的容积分析显示,术前中脑容积(5.84立方厘米对4.37立方厘米,P = 0.034)是GCS 15分和非GCS 15分组之间的显著差异因素。即使在调整年龄、性别和入院时GCS评分后,术前中脑容积在单因素(优势比[OR]=2.280,95%置信区间[CI]=1.126 - 5.929,P = 0.04)和多因素逻辑回归分析中(调整后OR = 3.204,95%CI = 1.228 - 12.438,P = 0.038)仍具有显著性。我们确定术前中脑容积的截断点为4.86立方厘米,其在两组之间的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.788,准确率为80.0%,敏感性为77.8%,特异性为81.8%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,术前中脑受压较轻的患者术后临床结局往往较好。因此,我们提出这个术前中脑容积截断点对我们队列中的临床结局具有预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/d8ff437fcbaa/SNI-15-437-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/156a8890b7fe/SNI-15-437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/03b8a780915c/SNI-15-437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/8c3977b96474/SNI-15-437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/670aff94fc29/SNI-15-437-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/d8ff437fcbaa/SNI-15-437-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/156a8890b7fe/SNI-15-437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/03b8a780915c/SNI-15-437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/8c3977b96474/SNI-15-437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/670aff94fc29/SNI-15-437-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/11618762/d8ff437fcbaa/SNI-15-437-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Midbrain volume in brain herniation: A volumetric analysis in operative traumatic brain injury.脑疝中的中脑体积:外伤性脑损伤手术中的体积分析
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Nov 29;15:437. doi: 10.25259/SNI_389_2024. eCollection 2024.
2
Prognostication of traumatic brain injury outcomes in older trauma patients: A novel risk assessment tool based on initial cranial CT findings.老年创伤患者创伤性脑损伤预后的预测:一种基于初始头颅CT表现的新型风险评估工具。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jan-Mar;7(1):23-31. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_2_17.
3
Evaluation of the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils score for predicting inpatient mortality among patients with traumatic subdural hematoma at United States trauma centers.评估美国创伤中心创伤性硬脑膜下血肿患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表瞳孔评分对内伤住院患者死亡率的预测价值。
J Neurosurg. 2024 May 3;141(4):908-916. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.JNS232695. Print 2024 Oct 1.
4
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Assessing outcomes in traumatic brain injury: Helsinki score versus Glasgow coma scale.创伤性脑损伤结局评估:赫尔辛基评分与格拉斯哥昏迷评分。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2491-2499. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02604-w. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
6
Cisternostomy is not beneficial to reduce the occurrence of post-traumatic hydrocephalus in Traumatic Brain Injury.经蝶窦入路视神经减压术不能降低颅脑创伤后发生脑积水的风险。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 30;166(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06084-0.
7
Outcomes of patients undergoing craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury with brain herniation: A retrospective study.接受开颅手术和去骨瓣减压术治疗伴有脑疝的重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22742. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022742.
8
Sequential changes in Rotterdam CT scores related to outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury who undergo decompressive craniectomy.接受减压性颅骨切除术的创伤性脑损伤患者的鹿特丹CT评分与预后相关的序贯变化。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1640-5. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142760. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
Neuronal Biomarker Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase Detects Traumatic Intracranial Lesions on Computed Tomography in Children and Youth with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.神经元生物标志物泛素羧基末端水解酶可在计算机断层扫描中检测轻度创伤性脑损伤的儿童和青少年的创伤性颅内病变。
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Jul 1;34(13):2132-2140. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4806. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
10
Predictive factors for cerebrocardiac syndrome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.重度创伤性脑损伤患者心脑综合征的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1192756. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1192756. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Time Course and Clinical Significance of Hematoma Expansion in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Observational Cohort Study.中等至重度创伤性脑损伤患者血肿扩大的时间过程和临床意义:一项观察性队列研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Feb;38(1):60-70. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01609-w. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Structural and Functional Alterations of Substantia Nigra and Associations With Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后黑质的结构和功能改变及其与焦虑和抑郁症状的关联
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 5;13:719778. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.719778. eCollection 2022.
3
Traumatic brain injury: a comparison of diffusion and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging measures.
创伤性脑损伤:扩散加权成像与容积磁共振成像测量的比较
Brain Commun. 2021 Jan 2;3(2):fcab006. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab006. eCollection 2021.
4
A Novel Automated Calculation of Basal Cistern Effacement Status on Computed Tomographic Imaging in Traumatic Brain Injury.一种用于创伤性脑损伤计算机断层扫描成像中基底池受压状态的新型自动计算方法。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 5;13(2):e13144. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13144.
5
Volumetric MRI Findings in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and Neuropsychological Outcome.容积 MRI 检查在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)和神经心理学预后中的应用。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Mar;33(1):5-41. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09474-0. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
Investigation of dynamic deformation of the midbrain in rear-end collision using human brain FE model.使用人体脑有限元模型研究追尾碰撞中中脑的动态变形。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Nov;23(15):1236-1246. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1795142. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Thresholds for identifying pathological intracranial pressure in paediatric traumatic brain injury.儿童创伤性脑损伤中识别病理性颅内压的阈值。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 5;9(1):3537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39848-1.
8
Automatic Quantification of Computed Tomography Features in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.急性创伤性脑损伤的计算机断层扫描特征的自动量化。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jun;36(11):1794-1803. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6183. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
Intracranial pressure elevations in diffuse axonal injury: association with nonhemorrhagic MR lesions in central mesencephalic structures.弥漫性轴索损伤患者颅内压升高:与中脑中央结构非出血性磁共振病变的相关性。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 14;131(2):604-611. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS18185. Print 2019 Aug 1.
10
Antero posterior elongation of midbrain in traumatic brain injury- significant sign yet a mistaken entity.
Br J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;32(2):129-135. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1432748. Epub 2018 Jan 31.