• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of human impact response in restraint systems with and without a negative G strap.

作者信息

Hearon B F, Brinkley J W

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Apr;57(4):301-12.

PMID:3964158
Abstract

A test program to assess the influence of a negative G strap on restraint dynamics and human impact response was conducted at AFAMRL. There were 131 experimental-level impact tests with volunteer subjects performed in eight different test conditions. Forward-facing (-Gx) impacts were carried out on a horizontal accelerator, while vertical (+Gz) impact tests were done on a vertical drop tower facility. In both axes, the experimental exposure was an approximate half-sine waveform with peak acceleration up to 10 G and velocity change up to 9.2 m X s-1. Subjects were restrained to the test vehicle using either the PCU-15/P torso harness and lap belt, which is used operationally in such aircraft as the A-20 and F-15, or a conventional double shoulder strap and lap belt configuration. In one half of the test conditions, fixed-length negative G straps were incorporated into these restraint systems. In the other test conditions, the unmodified restraint systems were evaluated. Adding the negative G strap to either restraint system had clearly beneficial effects. These included decreasing the tendency toward submarining in forward-facing impacts, providing better occupant-seat coupling during free falls, and improving vertical impact protection. Sufficient benefits appear to result from use of the negative G strap to warrant a recommendation for its incorporation into selected USAF restraint systems, such as the PCU-15/P torso harness and lap belt. Additional data analysis revealed that the conventional double shoulder strap and lap belt restraint provided better forward-facing and vertical impact protection than the PCU-15/P torso harness and lap belt configuration. Further research at AFAMRL is planned to identify restraint harness features which may improve the performance of current and future impact protection systems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of human impact response in restraint systems with and without a negative G strap.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Apr;57(4):301-12.
2
Vertical impact evaluation of the F/FB-111 crew restraint configuration, headrest position, and upper extremity bracing technique.F/FB - 111机组人员约束配置、头枕位置及上肢支撑技术的垂直冲击评估
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1983 Nov;54(11):977-87.
3
Effect of seat cushions on human response to +Gz impact.座椅靠垫对人体 +Gz 冲击响应的影响。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Feb;57(2):113-21.
4
Restraint harness performance during flight maneuvers: a parametric study.飞行机动期间约束背带性能:一项参数研究。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 May;86(5):466-71. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4126.2015.
5
A modified crash brace position for aircraft passengers.一种适用于飞机乘客的改良式防撞姿势。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 Oct;69(10):975-8.
6
Motor vehicle seat belt restraint system analysis during rollover.翻车过程中机动车安全带约束系统分析
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2003;39:229-40.
7
Biomechanical analysis of occupant kinematics in rollover motor vehicle accidents: dynamic spit test.翻车机动车事故中驾乘人员运动学的生物力学分析:动态唾液测试
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2005;41:104-9.
8
Biomechanical modeling of pregnant occupants in far-side vehicle crashes.远侧车辆碰撞中孕妇乘客的生物力学建模
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2006;42:154-9.
9
The effect of seat belt use on the cervical electromyogram response to whiplash-type impacts.安全带使用对颈椎肌电图对鞭打型撞击反应的影响。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Feb;29(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.008.
10
The effect of a 3-point harness restraint and car seat in whiplash-type lateral impacts.三点式安全带约束装置和汽车座椅在挥鞭样侧向碰撞中的作用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jan 1;31(1):E11-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000194024.94054.e3.