Suppr超能文献

老年人炎症生物标志物与新发房颤的评估

Assessment of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults.

作者信息

Shitole Sanyog G, Heckbert Susan R, Marcus Gregory M, Shah Sanjiv J, Sotoodehnia Nona, Walston Jeremy D, Reiner Alexander P, Tracy Russell P, Psaty Bruce M, Kizer Jorge R

机构信息

Cardiology Section San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System San Francisco CA USA.

Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):e035710. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035710. Epub 2024 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Available evidence supports the importance of inflammation in atrial fibrillation (AF) pathogenesis, yet general anti-inflammatory therapies have failed to show benefit for prevention of the arrhythmia. Better understanding of the specific inflammatory pathways involved is necessary to advance therapeutics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 9 circulating markers of inflammation measured by immunoassays and incidence of AF in a population-based older cohort. Biomarkers included measures of general inflammation and the NLR (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor) family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome, TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor α), monocyte activation markers, and sIL-2 (soluble interleukin-2). Among 5726 participants (median age 72 years), 1836 developed AF over median follow-up of 11.5 years. After adjustment for conventional risk factors, 5 biomarkers were positively associated with incident AF: IL-6 (interleukin-6), hazard ratio (HR), 1.14 (95% CI, 1.07-1.21); hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), HR, 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01-1.09); white blood cell count, HR, 1.18 (95% CI, 1.04-1.35); sTNFR1 (soluble TNF receptor 1), HR, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.05-1.39); and sIL-2Rα (sIL-2 receptor α), HR, 1.16 (95% CI, 1.05-1.29) (all per doubling of biomarker). sCD14, sCD163, IL-18, and IL-1 receptor antagonist showed no association with AF. Upon concurrent adjustment for all biomarkers, only IL-6 remained significantly associated with the arrhythmia, HR, 1.17 (95% CI, 1.07-1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults, IL-6, hs-CRP, white blood cell count, sTNFR1, and sIL-2Rα were positively associated with incident AF, but only IL-6 retained significance on concurrent adjustment. These findings newly document associations for sTNFR1 and sIL-2Rα and lend support to a preeminent role for IL-6 in development of this arrhythmia. The efficacy of IL-6 blockade for AF prevention awaits completion of appropriate clinical trials.

摘要

背景

现有证据支持炎症在心房颤动(AF)发病机制中的重要性,但一般抗炎治疗未能显示出预防心律失常的益处。更好地了解所涉及的特定炎症途径对于推进治疗方法是必要的。

方法与结果

我们评估了通过免疫测定法测量的9种循环炎症标志物以及基于人群的老年队列中的AF发病率。生物标志物包括一般炎症指标、含3个吡啉结构域的NLR(核苷酸结合寡聚化结构域样受体)家族炎性小体、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、单核细胞活化标志物和可溶性白细胞介素-2(sIL-2)。在5726名参与者(中位年龄72岁)中,1836人在中位随访11.5年期间发生了AF。在对传统危险因素进行调整后,5种生物标志物与新发AF呈正相关:白细胞介素-6(IL-6),风险比(HR)为1.14(95%CI,1.07 - 1.21);高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)为1.05(95%CI,1.01 - 1.09);白细胞计数为1.18(95%CI,1.04 - 1.35);可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体1(sTNFR1)为1.21(95%CI,1.05 - 1.39);可溶性白细胞介素-2受体α(sIL-2Rα)为1.16(95%CI,1.05 - 1.29)(所有均为生物标志物加倍时)。可溶性CD14、可溶性CD163、白细胞介素-18和白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂与AF无关联。在对所有生物标志物进行同时调整后,只有IL-6仍与心律失常显著相关,HR为1.17(95%CI,1.07 - 1.26)。

结论

在老年人中,IL-6、hs-CRP、白细胞计数、sTNFR1和sIL-2Rα与新发AF呈正相关,但只有IL-6在同时调整时仍具有显著性。这些发现首次记录了sTNFR1和sIL-2Rα的关联,并支持IL-6在这种心律失常发生中起主要作用。IL-6阻断预防AF的疗效有待适当临床试验完成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76b3/11935547/ec287a3bdc52/JAH3-13-e035710-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验