Suppr超能文献

通过电子顺磁共振研究没食子酸@二氧化硅和{透明质酸类似物}@二氧化硅对羟基(OH)自由基的杂化物:与它们的抗氧化氢原子转移活性的比较研究

Hybrids of Gallic Acid@SiO and {Hyaluronic-Acid Counterpats}@SiO against Hydroxyl (OH) Radicals Studied by EPR: A Comparative Study vs Their Antioxidant Hydrogen Atom Transfer Activity.

作者信息

Theofanous Annita, Deligiannakis Yiannis, Louloudi Maria

机构信息

Laboratory of Biomimetic Catalysis and Hybrid Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, Panepistimioupoli, Ioannina GR-45110, Greece.

Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Materials and Environment, Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, Panepistimioupoli, Ioannina GR-45110, Greece.

出版信息

Langmuir. 2024 Dec 17;40(50):26412-26424. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c02760. Epub 2024 Dec 7.

Abstract

Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and single electron transfer (SET) are two fundamental pathways for antiradical/antioxidant processes; however, a systematic operational evaluation of the same system is lacking. Herein, we present a comparative study of the HAT and SET processes applied to a library of well-characterized hybrid materials SiO@GA, SiO@GLA, SiO@GLAM, and the doubly hybrid material {GLA@SiO@GLAM}. Hydroxyl radicals (OH), produced by a Fenton system, react via the single electron transfer (SET) pathway and hydrogen atom transfer, through oxygen- and carbon-atoms, respectively, while the stable-radical DPPH via the HAT pathway through oxygen-atoms. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR), eminently suited for detection and quantification of free radicals, was used as a state-of-the-art tool to monitor OH using the spin-trapping-EPR method. We found that the SiO@GA hybrid exhibited the highest SET OH-scavenging activity i.e., [2.7 mol of OH per mol of grafted GA]. Then, SiO@GLA, SiO@GLAM, and GLA@SiO@GLAM can scavenge 1.2, 1.3, and 0.57 mol of OH per mol of anchored organic, respectively. The HAT efficiency for SiO@GA was [2.0 mol of DPPH per mol of grafted GA], while SiO@GLA, SiO@GLAM, and GLA@SiO@GLAM exhibited a HAT efficiency of 1.1 DPPH moles per mol of anchored organic. The data are analyzed based on the molecular structure of the organics and their -R-OH moieties. Accordingly, based on the present data we suggest that for hydroxyl (OH) radicals, the mechanisms involved are SET from an oxygen atom and HAT from a carbon atom. In contrast, for DPPH radicals, the HAT mechanism is exclusively operating and involves hydrogen atom abstraction from OH groups.

摘要

氢原子转移(HAT)和单电子转移(SET)是抗自由基/抗氧化过程的两种基本途径;然而,目前缺乏对同一体系的系统操作评估。在此,我们对应用于一系列特征明确的杂化材料SiO@GA、SiO@GLA、SiO@GLAM以及双杂化材料{GLA@SiO@GLAM}的HAT和SET过程进行了比较研究。由芬顿体系产生的羟基自由基(OH)分别通过单电子转移(SET)途径以及通过氧原子和碳原子进行氢原子转移来发生反应,而稳定自由基二苯基苦味酰基自由基(DPPH)则通过氧原子经由HAT途径发生反应。电子顺磁共振光谱(EPR)非常适合自由基的检测和定量,被用作一种先进工具,采用自旋捕获 - EPR方法监测OH。我们发现SiO@GA杂化材料表现出最高的SET OH清除活性,即[每摩尔接枝的GA能清除2.7摩尔的OH]。然后,SiO@GLA、SiO@GLAM和GLA@SiO@GLAM每摩尔锚定有机物分别可以清除1.2、1.3和0.57摩尔的OH。SiO@GA的HAT效率为[每摩尔接枝的GA能清除2.0摩尔的DPPH],而SiO@GLA、SiO@GLAM和GLA@SiO@GLAM每摩尔锚定有机物的HAT效率为1.1摩尔DPPH。基于有机物及其 -R-OH部分的分子结构对数据进行了分析。因此,根据目前的数据我们认为,对于羟基(OH)自由基,涉及的机制是从氧原子进行SET以及从碳原子进行HAT。相比之下,对于DPPH自由基,HAT机制是唯一起作用的机制,涉及从OH基团夺取氢原子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验