Suppr超能文献

华盛顿州休闲大麻合法化后,大麻是替代还是补充酒精?一项三级混合效应建模研究。

Does cannabis substitute or complement alcohol after recreational cannabis legalization in the Washington State? A three-level mixed-effects modeling.

作者信息

Zhu Yachen, Trangenstein Pamela J, Kerr William C

机构信息

Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound St, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.

Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound St, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2025 Mar;162:108218. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108218. Epub 2024 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether cannabis substitute or complement alcohol remains inconclusive. Little is known about the daily-level associations between cannabis and alcohol use by cannabis user type (medical vs. recreational use) in people who use alcohol and cannabis within a legalized environment.

METHODS

Adult participants were from four waves of Washington Panel Survey during 2014-2016, who consumed both cannabis and alcohol in the past six months. Daily measurements of alcohol and cannabis use in the past week were collected at each wave. Our outcome variable was continuous alcoholic drinks, the exposure was any cannabis use. We applied three-level negative binomial models to account for within-person wave-to-wave and between-person variations, deriving pure within-person within-wave associations between cannabis and alcohol use at the daily level. A cross-level interaction between day-level cannabis use and wave-level medical cannabis recommendation investigated the potential differential substitution/complementarity patterns by medical recommendation status.

RESULTS

259 respondents with 440 person-waves and 3,051 daily observations were included. We found a statistically significant pure Level 1 (within-person daily-level) effect of cannabis use among recreational cannabis users (IRR = 1.37, 95 % CI: 1.05-1.79, p = 0.02), showing a complementary use pattern. We also found a statistically significant cross-level interaction between medical cannabis recommendation and cannabis use at Level 1 (IRR = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.96, p = 0.03), indicating that, differently from recreational users, medical cannabis users may have a substitution use pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis user type may inform co-use patterns. This study suggested recreational cannabis users tended to use alcohol and cannabis in a complementary manner in Washington State following the legalization of recreational use.

摘要

背景

大麻是替代还是补充酒精尚无定论。在大麻和酒精使用均合法化的环境中,按大麻使用类型(医疗用途与娱乐用途),人们对于大麻与酒精日常使用之间的关联知之甚少。

方法

成年参与者来自2014年至2016年期间华盛顿小组调查的四个阶段,他们在过去六个月内同时使用过大麻和酒精。在每个阶段收集过去一周内酒精和大麻使用情况的每日测量数据。我们的结果变量是连续饮酒量,暴露因素是是否使用大麻。我们应用三级负二项式模型来考虑个体内不同阶段之间以及个体间的差异,得出每日水平上大麻与酒精使用之间纯粹的个体内阶段内关联。每日大麻使用与阶段水平医疗大麻推荐之间的跨水平交互作用研究了根据医疗推荐状态可能存在的不同替代/互补模式。

结果

纳入了259名受访者,共440人次阶段数据和3051条每日观察数据。我们发现,娱乐性大麻使用者中,大麻使用存在统计学上显著的纯粹一级(个体内每日水平)效应(发病率比=1.37,95%置信区间:1.05 - 1.79,p = 0.02),呈现互补使用模式。我们还发现,医疗大麻推荐与一级水平大麻使用之间存在统计学上显著的跨水平交互作用(发病率比=0.57,95%置信区间:0.34 - 0.96,p = 0.03),这表明与娱乐性使用者不同,医疗大麻使用者可能存在替代使用模式。

结论

大麻使用类型可能影响联合使用模式。本研究表明,在华盛顿州娱乐性大麻使用合法化后,娱乐性大麻使用者倾向于以互补方式使用酒精和大麻。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验