• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球有志于或正在进行临床学术发展的护士所面临的机遇:一项范围综述方案

Opportunities for nurses aspiring to or undertaking clinical academic development globally: protocol for a scoping review.

作者信息

Jennings Claire, Norman Gill, Marshall Marie, Briggs Michelle

机构信息

Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 31;14(8):e078562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078562.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078562
PMID:39645261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11367388/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nurse researchers often lack awareness of how to start a clinical academic research career and often lack clear entry routes. This scoping review aims to identify the range and nature of clinical academic opportunities available for nurses. This will also identify the knowledge gaps and provide the basis for future research.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The review will be conducted using scoping review methodology and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses with the Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We will search CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), AMED (Ovid) and ProQuest using a search based on the facet's 'nurse', 'research' and 'clinical academic'. Grey literature and a hand search of the reference lists will be conducted for additional publications meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We will include articles published in English, with a focus on registered nurses interested in undertaking clinical academic development within any healthcare system, with no restrictions regarding the date of publication. Following initial screening of titles and abstracts, relevant full-text papers will be screened for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will participate in an iterative process of screening the literature, paper selection and data extraction. We will use a prespecified form to extract data which will be charted and presented in a tabular form. Samples of data extraction and charting will be checked by a second reviewer. This will support a narrative summary structured around key identified variables agreed on iteratively by the review team.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical or Health Research Authority approval is required to undertake this scoping review. The findings will inform future research exploring the opportunities supporting nurses aspiring to undertake clinical academic development and be disseminated via presentations at national conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework, DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/WVDXH.

摘要

引言

护士研究人员常常不清楚如何开启临床学术研究职业生涯,且往往缺乏明确的入门途径。本综述旨在确定护士可获得的临床学术机会的范围和性质。这也将找出知识空白,并为未来研究提供依据。

方法与分析

本综述将采用综述方法进行,并按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目及综述扩展指南进行报告。我们将在CINAHL(EBSCO)、MEDLINE(Ovid)、AMED(Ovid)和ProQuest数据库中进行检索,检索词基于“护士”“研究”和“临床学术”这些方面。将对灰色文献进行检索,并手动查阅参考文献列表,以获取符合纳入和排除标准的其他出版物。我们将纳入以英文发表的文章,重点关注有兴趣在任何医疗系统内开展临床学术发展的注册护士,对发表日期不作限制。在对标题和摘要进行初步筛选后,将对相关全文论文进行筛选以确定是否纳入。两名独立评审员将参与文献筛选、论文选择和数据提取的迭代过程。我们将使用预先指定的表格来提取数据,这些数据将被制成图表并以表格形式呈现。数据提取和制表的样本将由另一名评审员进行检查。这将支持围绕评审团队反复商定的关键确定变量构建的叙述性总结。

伦理与传播

进行本综述无需伦理或健康研究管理局的批准。研究结果将为未来探索支持有志于开展临床学术发展的护士的机会的研究提供参考,并将通过在全国会议上的报告以及在同行评审期刊上发表来进行传播。

研究注册

开放科学框架,DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/WVDXH。

相似文献

1
Opportunities for nurses aspiring to or undertaking clinical academic development globally: protocol for a scoping review.全球有志于或正在进行临床学术发展的护士所面临的机遇:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 31;14(8):e078562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078562.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
6
Global overview of pharmacy support personnel training programmes: a scoping review protocol.全球药学支持人员培训计划概述:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 29;13(3):e069279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069279.
7
Uterine fibroids and Black people of African descent globally: a scoping review protocol.全球范围内的子宫肌瘤和非裔非洲人:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 25;14(8):e085622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085622.
8
What is known from the existing literature about self-management of pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse? A scoping review protocol.现有文献中关于盆腔器官脱垂阴道子宫托自我管理的内容有哪些?系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e055587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055587.
9
Linguistically responsive learning and teaching for non-native speakers in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.本科护理教育中非母语者的语言响应式学习与教学:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e083181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083181.
10
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of healthcare leaders in implementing equitable clinical academic pathways for nurses: An integrative review.医疗保健领导者在为护士实施公平的临床学术途径中的作用:综合评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Aug;80(8):3119-3133. doi: 10.1111/jan.16043. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
2
The Experiences of Clinical Academic Nurses: A Meta-Aggregation.临床学术护士的经历:一项元聚合研究
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023 Feb;39(1):151364. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151364. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
3
Doctoral programmes in the nursing discipline: a scoping review.护理学科的博士项目:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 15;20(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00753-6.
4
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.范围综述:加强和推进方法和应用。
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;10(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3.
5
A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine.一项探索医疗保健专业人员在医学之外开展临床学术活动的影响的定性系统评价和主题综合研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06354-y.
6
Interventions and strategies aimed at clinical academic pathway development for nurses in the United Kingdom: A systematised review of the literature.干预措施和策略旨在为英国护士发展临床学术途径:文献系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(11-12):1502-1518. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15657. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions.高质量范围综述的实施:挑战与解决方案。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
8
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
9
Factors impacting on retention, success and equitable participation in clinical academic careers: a scoping review and meta-thematic synthesis.影响临床学术职业保留、成功和公平参与的因素:范围综述和元主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 25;10(3):e033480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033480.
10
Shouldn't we all be clinical academics?我们难道不都应该成为临床学者吗?
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Sep;75(9):1817-1818. doi: 10.1111/jan.14026. Epub 2019 Jun 4.