Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(11-12):1502-1518. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15657. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
To review interventions and strategies designed to progress UK clinical academic career pathways in nursing and identify barriers and facilitators to aid wider implementation.
For over a decade, the UK political agenda has promoted the entry of nurses into clinical academic roles. Partnerships between the National Health Service and academia are known to increase nursing recruitment, retention and quality of care. However, there remains a lack of nurses working in these partnership roles.
A systematised review was conducted. An electronic database search was carried out in PubMed, CINAHL, the British Nursing Database and PsychInfo for articles published between September 2006 to June 2020. A narrative approach to data synthesis was used, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.
Ten papers were included in the review. The authors reported a range of programmes, pathways and toolkits. Pathway outcome measures included numbers of nurses recruited onto clinical academic programmes, clinical academic programmes completed, nursing research outputs, impact on clinical practice and impact on nursing recruitment. Barriers and facilitators to pathway development included funding, clinical and research time constraints, infrastructure, strong and strategic clinical academic leadership and effective partnership working. The quality of the included studies was mixed; more high-quality, evidence-based programmes need to be developed and rigorously evaluated.
The findings can inform nursing clinical academic research pathway development internationally, by identifying key drivers for success. Sustained and cohesive implementation of clinical academic research pathways is lacking across the UK.
Strong, strategic leadership is required to enable progression of clinical academic nursing research pathway opportunities. Clinical nursing practitioners need to collaborate with external partners to enable development of clinical academic pathways within the nursing profession; this can lead to improvements in patient care and high-quality clinical outcomes.
回顾旨在推进英国护理临床学术职业道路的干预措施和策略,并确定障碍和促进因素,以帮助更广泛地实施。
十多年来,英国的政治议程一直推动护士进入临床学术角色。众所周知,国家卫生服务机构与学术界之间的伙伴关系可以增加护士的招聘、留用率和护理质量。然而,仍有相当数量的护士没有从事这些合作角色。
进行了系统综述。在 PubMed、CINAHL、英国护理数据库和 PsychInfo 中进行了电子数据库搜索,以查找 2006 年 9 月至 2020 年 6 月期间发表的文章。采用叙述性方法对数据进行综合,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。
综述共纳入 10 篇论文。作者报告了一系列方案、途径和工具包。途径结果测量包括招聘到临床学术项目的护士人数、完成的临床学术项目、护理研究成果、对临床实践的影响以及对护理招聘的影响。途径发展的障碍和促进因素包括资金、临床和研究时间限制、基础设施、强大和战略临床学术领导力以及有效的伙伴关系。纳入研究的质量参差不齐;需要开发更多高质量、基于证据的方案,并进行严格评估。
通过确定成功的关键驱动因素,这些发现可以为国际上的护理临床学术研究途径发展提供信息。在整个英国,临床学术研究途径的持续和协调实施都缺乏。
需要强有力的战略领导来促进临床学术护理研究途径的发展。临床护理从业人员需要与外部合作伙伴合作,在护理专业内部发展临床学术途径;这可以改善患者护理和高质量的临床结果。