• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从业者对暂停的使用及接受度

Practitioners' Use and Acceptability of Time-Out.

作者信息

Jugovac Samantha, Hawes David J, Tully Lucy A, Pasalich Dave S

机构信息

School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Building 39, Science Rd, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01798-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10578-024-01798-9
PMID:39648194
Abstract

Time-out is an empirically supported component of parenting interventions for child conduct problems; however, it is receiving increasing criticism among parents and some practitioners. This study aimed to investigate practitioners' use and acceptability of time-out for child conduct problems; examine whether perceived effectiveness and knowledge of evidence-based parameters of time-out implementation influence use and acceptability of time-out; and explore practitioners' perceptions about alternatives to time-out. One hundred and ten Australian and New Zealand practitioners who have worked with children and families completed an online survey investigating their use and acceptability of time-out for children with conduct problems. Results showed that 55.5% of the sample have used timeout, with 38.0% considered current TO users. Acceptability of the strategy varied, with some practitioners critical of time-out. Increased knowledge of evidence-based parameters of time-out implementation was associated with increased frequency of time-out use and acceptability, while perceived effectiveness was associated with increased acceptability only. Practitioners perceived a number of other parenting strategies as effective alternatives to time-out. These findings have important implications for improving practitioners' implementation of time-out with parents of children with conduct problems.

摘要

暂停是针对儿童行为问题的育儿干预措施中一项得到实证支持的内容;然而,它在家长和一些从业者中受到越来越多的批评。本研究旨在调查从业者对针对儿童行为问题的暂停措施的使用情况和可接受性;检验对暂停实施的循证参数的感知有效性和了解程度是否会影响暂停的使用和可接受性;并探索从业者对暂停替代方法的看法。110名曾与儿童及家庭打过交道的澳大利亚和新西兰从业者完成了一项在线调查,调查他们对有行为问题儿童使用暂停措施的情况和可接受性。结果显示,55.5%的样本使用过暂停措施,其中38.0%的人认为自己目前是暂停措施的使用者。该策略的可接受性各不相同,一些从业者对暂停措施持批评态度。对暂停实施的循证参数了解程度的提高与暂停使用频率和可接受性的增加相关,而感知有效性仅与可接受性的增加相关。从业者认为其他一些育儿策略是有效的暂停替代方法。这些发现对于改善从业者与有行为问题儿童的家长实施暂停措施具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Practitioners' Use and Acceptability of Time-Out.从业者对暂停的使用及接受度
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01798-9.
2
Changes in practitioners' attitudes, perceived training needs and self-efficacy over the implementation process of an evidence-based parenting program.在实施基于证据的育儿计划过程中,实践者态度、感知培训需求和自我效能的变化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 27;20(1):1092. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05939-3.
3
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
4
An Updated Account on Parents' Use of and Attitudes Towards Time-Out.关于父母使用“暂停”措施及其态度的最新报告。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Apr;54(2):436-449. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
An Exploration of Practitioners' Experiences of Delivering Digital Social Care Interventions to Children and Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study.新冠疫情期间从业者为儿童及其家庭提供数字社会关怀干预措施的经验探索:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 28;7:e43498. doi: 10.2196/43498.
6
Cochrane review: behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years (Review).Cochrane系统评价:基于行为和认知行为的小组育儿计划对3至12岁儿童早期品行问题的影响(综述)
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Mar 7;8(2):318-692. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1905.
7
Personalised interventions for subgroups of children with conduct problems.针对行为问题儿童亚组的个性化干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 28;4(4):CD012746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012746.pub2.
8
Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years.针对3至12岁儿童早期出现的品行问题的基于行为和认知行为的团体育儿项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD008225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008225.pub2.
9
Stepped-Care Web-Based Parent Support Following Congenital Heart Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于阶梯式护理的先天性心脏病患儿家长网络支持方案:一项随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 4;13:e64216. doi: 10.2196/64216.
10
The process in-between: Parents' perceptions about how practitioners promote the outcomes of the Incredible Years Basic program.中间过程:父母对从业者如何促进“非凡岁月基础项目”成果的看法。
Fam Process. 2024 Dec;63(4):1867-1886. doi: 10.1111/famp.13018. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychopathology of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS): a network analysis based on CBCL scales in 72,106 Chinese school students.认知脱离综合征(CDS)的精神病理学:基于72106名中国在校学生CBCL量表的网络分析
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;34(3):1081-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02540-5. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
Practitioner Review: A core competencies perspective on the evidence-based treatment of child conduct problems.从业者综述:基于核心能力的儿童品行问题循证治疗。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;65(2):124-136. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13882. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Interventions for Young Children's Mental Health: A Review of Reviews.
干预儿童心理健康:综述研究。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2023 Sep;26(3):593-641. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00443-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Clinician Maladaptive Anxious Avoidance in the Context of Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions: A Commentary.基于证据的干预措施实施背景下临床医生的适应不良性焦虑回避:一篇评论
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jun;2. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.833214. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
5
Using Time-out for Child Conduct Problems in the Context of Trauma and Adversity: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.创伤和逆境背景下使用暂停时间处理儿童行为问题:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229726. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29726.
6
Attachment- and Emotion-Focused Parenting Interventions for Child and Adolescent Externalizing and Internalizing Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis.依恋和情绪焦点型养育干预对儿童和青少年外化和内化行为的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2022 Dec;25(4):754-773. doi: 10.1007/s10567-022-00401-8. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
7
Toward evidence-informed child rearing: Measurement of time-out implementation in a community sample.迈向基于证据的育儿:社区样本中暂停措施实施情况的测量。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;28(2):417-433. doi: 10.1177/13591045221076644. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
8
Time-Out with Young Children: A Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Practitioner Review.与幼儿的“暂停时间”:亲子互动疗法(PCIT)从业者述评。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010145.
9
An Updated Account on Parents' Use of and Attitudes Towards Time-Out.关于父母使用“暂停”措施及其态度的最新报告。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Apr;54(2):436-449. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Longitudinal Relationship Between Time-Out and Child Emotional and Behavioral Functioning.暂停与儿童情绪和行为功能之间的纵向关系。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020 Jan;41(1):31-37. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000725.