• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤和逆境背景下使用暂停时间处理儿童行为问题:一项非随机对照试验。

Using Time-out for Child Conduct Problems in the Context of Trauma and Adversity: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, The University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229726. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29726.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29726
PMID:36048440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9437765/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Exposure to adverse childhood experiences substantially increases the risk of chronic health problems. Originally designed to treat child conduct problems, parent management training programs have been shown to be effective in preventing children from being exposed to further adversity and supporting children's recovery from adversity; however, there are increasing concerns that a core component of these programs, the discipline strategy time-out, may be harmful for children with a history of exposure to adversity.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the comparative benefits and potential harms to children exposed to adversity that are associated with parenting programs that include time-out.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nonrandomized waiting list-controlled clinical study was conducted at a specialist clinic for the treatment of conduct problems in Sydney, Australia. The self-referred sample included children with conduct problems and their caregivers. Eligibility was confirmed through clinician-administered interviews. Data were collected between February 14, 2018, and February 1, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Caregivers participated in a 10-session, social learning-based parent management training program. Caregivers were provided with parenting strategies aimed at encouraging desired behaviors through effective reinforcement and managing misbehavior through consistent limit setting, including the use of time-outs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire score, and secondary outcomes included subscale scores from the clinician-administered Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Adolescents, and Parents. Multi-informant measures of child adversity were collected using the parent-reported Adverse Life Experiences Scale and the clinician-rated Maltreatment Index.

RESULTS

A total of 205 children were included in analysis (156 in the full intervention and 49 in the control condition; 158 boys [77.1%]; mean [SD] age, 5.6 [1.8] years [range, 2-9 years]). Compared with children with low adversity exposure, children with high adversity exposure showed greater reductions in the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire score from baseline (mean difference, 3.46 [95% CI, 1.51-5.41]; P < .001) to after treatment (mean difference, 1.49 [95% CI, -0.46 to 3.44]; P = .13) and in the internalizing symptom subscale score (baseline mean difference, 1.00 [95% CI, -2,00 to 0.00]; P = .50; posttreatment mean difference, 0.06 [95% CI, -0.82 to 0.94]; P = .90). No significant differences in the externalizing symptom subscale score were found.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this nonrandomized clinical study, children with high exposure to adversity experienced equivalent, if not greater, benefits associated with parenting programs that include time-out compared with children with low exposure to adversity. Results suggest that time-out was an effective component of parenting programs for children exposed to adversity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12617001472369.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/873abb3f46e8/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/1cbbf2651208/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/52bb6d196df5/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/e7cd90dd2c92/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/873abb3f46e8/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/1cbbf2651208/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/52bb6d196df5/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/e7cd90dd2c92/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8391/9437765/873abb3f46e8/jamanetwopen-e2229726-g004.jpg
摘要

重要性

儿童期逆境经历会大大增加患慢性健康问题的风险。最初旨在治疗儿童行为问题的父母管理培训计划已被证明能有效防止儿童遭受更多逆境,并支持儿童从逆境中恢复;然而,人们越来越担心这些项目的一个核心组成部分,即纪律策略暂停,可能对曾经历过逆境的儿童有害。

目的

研究与包括暂停在内的育儿项目相关的、对经历过逆境的儿童的比较益处和潜在危害。

设计、设置和参与者:这是一项非随机等待名单对照临床研究,在澳大利亚悉尼的一家专门治疗行为问题的诊所进行。自我推荐的样本包括有行为问题的儿童及其照顾者。通过临床医生管理的访谈确认合格。数据收集于 2018 年 2 月 14 日至 2021 年 2 月 1 日。

干预措施

照顾者参加了一个 10 节、基于社会学习的父母管理培训计划。照顾者获得了育儿策略,旨在通过有效的强化鼓励期望的行为,并通过一致的限制设定来管理不良行为,包括使用暂停。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是父母报告的困难问题问卷评分,次要结果包括临床医生管理的儿童、青少年和父母诊断访谈时间表的子量表评分。使用父母报告的不良生活经历量表和临床医生评定的虐待指数多信息源测量儿童逆境。

结果

共有 205 名儿童纳入分析(156 名在全干预组,49 名在对照组;158 名男孩[77.1%];平均[SD]年龄,5.6[1.8]岁[范围,2-9 岁])。与低逆境暴露的儿童相比,高逆境暴露的儿童从基线到治疗后的困难问题问卷评分(平均差异,3.46[95%CI,1.51-5.41];P<0.001)和内化症状子量表评分(基线平均差异,1.00[95%CI,-2.00 至 0.00];P=0.50;治疗后平均差异,0.06[95%CI,-0.82 至 0.94];P=0.90)都有更大的降低。在外化症状子量表评分方面没有发现显著差异。

结论和相关性

在这项非随机临床研究中,与低逆境暴露的儿童相比,高逆境暴露的儿童经历了相同的、甚至更大的益处,与包括暂停在内的育儿项目相关。结果表明,暂停是针对经历过逆境的儿童的育儿项目的有效组成部分。

试验注册

anzctr.org.au 标识符:ACTRN12617001472369。

相似文献

1
Using Time-out for Child Conduct Problems in the Context of Trauma and Adversity: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.创伤和逆境背景下使用暂停时间处理儿童行为问题:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229726. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29726.
2
A video-feedback parenting intervention to prevent enduring behaviour problems in at-risk children aged 12-36 months: the Healthy Start, Happy Start RCT.视频反馈式育儿干预预防 12-36 月龄高危儿童持久行为问题:健康启动,快乐启动 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(29):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta25290.
3
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
4
A Brief Home-Based Parenting Intervention to Reduce Behavior Problems in Young Children: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.一项基于家庭的简短育儿干预措施以减少幼儿行为问题:一项实用性随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jun 1;175(6):567-576. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.6834.
5
Supporting Parents & Kids Through Lockdown Experiences (SPARKLE): A digital parenting support app implemented in an ongoing general population cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.支持父母和孩子度过封锁期(SPARKLE):在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在一项正在进行的一般人群队列研究中实施的数字育儿支持应用程序:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 10;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05226-4.
6
Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Parenting Intervention for Promoting Social-Emotional School Readiness Among Children From Low-Income Families in Hong Kong: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.香港低收入家庭儿童社会情绪学校准备度促进的多成分养育干预的效果:一项群组随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Apr 1;176(4):357-364. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.6308.
7
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Personalised interventions for subgroups of children with conduct problems.针对行为问题儿童亚组的个性化干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 28;4(4):CD012746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012746.pub2.
10
A Tailored Web-Based Intervention to Improve Parenting Risk and Protective Factors for Adolescent Depression and Anxiety Problems: Postintervention Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于网络的个性化干预措施,旨在改善青少年抑郁和焦虑问题的养育风险及保护因素:一项随机对照试验的干预后结果
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 19;20(1):e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9139.

引用本文的文献

1
Practitioners' Use and Acceptability of Time-Out.从业者对暂停的使用及接受度
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01798-9.
2
Time-out under scrutiny: examining the relationships among the discipline strategy time-out, child well-being and attachment and exposure to adversity.审视下的暂停:探究纪律策略性暂停、儿童福祉与依恋以及逆境暴露之间的关系。
Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;227(2):538-544. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.228.
3
A Developmental Psychopathology Perspective on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Introduction to the Special Issue.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Adolescents, and Parents-5 in externalizing disorders and common comorbidities.DSM-5 儿童、青少年和父母诊断访谈表 5 在外显障碍和常见共病中的信度和效度。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;27(3):870-881. doi: 10.1177/13591045211061800. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
2
An Updated Account on Parents' Use of and Attitudes Towards Time-Out.关于父母使用“暂停”措施及其态度的最新报告。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Apr;54(2):436-449. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
3
Capturing the developmental timing of adverse childhood experiences: The Adverse Life Experiences Scale.
发展心理病理学视角下的逆境儿童经历(ACEs):特刊介绍
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Dec;51(12):1715-1723. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01100-w. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
捕捉不良童年经历的发展时间:不良生活经历量表。
Am Psychol. 2021 Feb-Mar;76(2):253-267. doi: 10.1037/amp0000760.
4
The effectiveness of psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心理干预对儿童、青少年和青年成年人创伤后应激障碍的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(10):1598-1612. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720002007. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
5
Mechanisms linking childhood trauma exposure and psychopathology: a transdiagnostic model of risk and resilience.链接儿童期创伤暴露与精神病理学的机制:一种风险和弹性的跨诊断模型。
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 1;18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01561-6.
6
Research Review: Psychological and psychosocial treatments for children and young people with post-traumatic stress disorder: a network meta-analysis.研究综述:创伤后应激障碍儿童和青少年的心理和心理社会治疗:网络荟萃分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;61(1):18-29. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13094. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Therapist-assisted online treatment for child conduct problems in rural and urban families: Two randomized controlled trials.治疗师辅助的在线治疗对农村和城市家庭儿童行为问题的效果:两项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Aug;87(8):706-719. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000419. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
8
What is it to discipline a child: What should it be? A reanalysis of time-out from the perspective of child mental health, attachment, and trauma.如何管教孩子:应该是什么样的?从儿童心理健康、依恋和创伤的角度重新分析暂停时间。
Am Psychol. 2019 Oct;74(7):794-808. doi: 10.1037/amp0000449. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
Practitioner Review: Posttraumatic stress disorder and its treatment in children and adolescents.从业者综述:儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍及其治疗。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 May;60(5):500-515. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12983. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
10
Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences From the 2011-2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 23 States.23 个州 2011-2014 年行为风险因素监测系统中不良儿童经历的流行率。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1038-1044. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2537.