McLaughlin J K, Blot W J, Mehl E S, Mandel J S
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jan;121(1):131-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113975.
A recently completed case-control study in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area using population-based living controls and dead controls afforded the opportunity to compare these two control groups on their exposure histories. Detailed information was obtained by interview from 697 living controls and the next of kin of 493 dead controls. The dead controls of both sexes were reported to have been significantly heavier cigarette smokers compared with living controls, as well as heavier consumers of hard liquor, beer, and drugs, and to have had more adulthood diseases. There were no consistent differences between the control groups for consumption of nonalcoholic beverages, some aspects of diet, ethnic and religious background, usual occupation, and residential history. It appears that exposures associated with premature death are overrepresented in dead controls compared with living controls, while those variables not associated with premature mortality are distributed more or less similarly between the two groups.
最近在明尼阿波利斯-圣保罗地区完成的一项病例对照研究,使用基于人群的在世对照和已故对照,提供了一个机会来比较这两个对照组的暴露史。通过访谈从697名在世对照和493名已故对照的近亲那里获得了详细信息。据报告,与在世对照相比,已故对照无论男女都是吸烟量显著更大,烈性酒、啤酒和毒品的消费量也更大,并且患成年期疾病更多。在非酒精饮料消费、饮食的某些方面、种族和宗教背景、通常职业以及居住史方面,对照组之间没有一致的差异。与在世对照相比,与过早死亡相关的暴露在已故对照中似乎被过度代表,而那些与过早死亡率无关的变量在两组之间的分布大致相似。