Westhoff T A, Behling-Kelly E L, Mann S
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
JDS Commun. 2024 Jul 14;5(6):679-683. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0604. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Determining the concentration of IgG in colostrum is critical for assessment of colostrum quality. On-farm use of a Brix refractometer to estimate colostrum IgG concentration is widespread, whereas radial immunodiffusion (RID) is the laboratory reference method. Turbidimetric immunoassay (TIA) might offer an alternative method to quantify IgG in colostrum, but the agreement with RID, as well as critical thresholds to determine high-quality colostrum, remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to determine the level of agreement between RID, Brix %, and TIA for evaluation of colostrum quality. Composite colostrum samples (n = 58) from Holstein cows were evaluated using a digital Brix refractometer at the time of collection and stored at -20°C until analysis. The concentration of IgG was determined using RID and TIA. Data were analyzed using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots. Critical thresholds for TIA and Brix measurements to identify colostrum with an IgG concentration ≥50 and ≥100 g/L based on the reference method were determined using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results revealed that both TIA (Kendall's τ = 0.91) and Brix % (τ = 0.78) had a strong correlation with RID. Passing-Bablok regression identified a systematic (6.91 [4.33 to 8.98] g/L) and proportional (0.69 [0.67 to 0.72] g/L) bias between RID and TIA. The optimum thresholds to identify samples with an IgG concentration ≥50 and ≥100 g/L were 40.6 g/L (area under the curve [AUC]: 1.0; sensitivity (Se): 100; specificity [Sp]: 100) and 85.8 g/L (AUC: 0.99; Se: 96.6; Sp: 96.6) for TIA and 18.4% (AUC: 1.0; Se: 100; Sp: 100) and 25.8% (AUC: 0.99; Se: 82.8; Sp: 93.1) for Brix %, respectively. Using the identified thresholds, our results show that both Brix and TIA were highly accurate for identifying high-quality colostrum, but because of a proportional bias, direct comparison of IgG concentration results obtained by RID and TIA are cautioned.
测定初乳中IgG的浓度对于评估初乳质量至关重要。在农场使用糖度折射仪估算初乳IgG浓度的情况很普遍,而放射免疫扩散法(RID)是实验室参考方法。比浊免疫分析法(TIA)可能提供一种量化初乳中IgG的替代方法,但与RID的一致性以及确定高质量初乳的临界阈值仍不确定。本研究的目的是确定RID、糖度百分比和TIA在评估初乳质量方面的一致性水平。在采集时使用数字糖度折射仪对来自荷斯坦奶牛的复合初乳样本(n = 58)进行评估,并在-20°C下储存直至分析。使用RID和TIA测定IgG的浓度。数据采用Passing-Bablok回归和Bland-Altman图进行分析。使用逻辑回归和受试者工作特征曲线确定基于参考方法的TIA和糖度测量的临界阈值,以识别IgG浓度≥50和≥100 g/L的初乳。结果显示,TIA(肯德尔τ = 0.91)和糖度百分比(τ = 0.78)与RID均具有很强的相关性。Passing-Bablok回归确定了RID和TIA之间存在系统性偏差(6.91 [4.33至8.98] g/L)和成比例偏差(0.69 [0.67至0.72] g/L)。识别IgG浓度≥50和≥100 g/L样本的最佳阈值,TIA分别为40.6 g/L(曲线下面积[AUC]:1.0;灵敏度[Se]:100;特异性[Sp]:100)和85.8 g/L(AUC:0.99;Se:96.6;Sp:96.6),糖度百分比分别为18.4%(AUC:1.0;Se:100;Sp:100)和25.8%(AUC:0.99;Se:82.8;Sp:93.1)。使用确定的阈值,我们的结果表明,糖度和TIA在识别高质量初乳方面都非常准确,但由于存在成比例偏差,谨慎对待RID和TIA获得的IgG浓度结果的直接比较。