Kamath Prakrati, Kamath Prathvi, Nayak P Anupama, Natarajan Srikant, Jain Mukul Shantilal, Rao Ashwin, Mahabala Karuna Y, Thimmaiah Charisma, Baliga Kiran N
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Oct;17(10):1141-1145. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2969.
Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is characterized by sharp shooting pain due to exposed dentin, and the most common method for treating this pain is the occlusion of the dentinal tubules with the help of desensitizing agents. E-silver diamine fluoride (e-SDF) (Kids-e-Dental, Mumbai, India) is a commercially available 38% SDF solution in the Indian market. Despite the fact that its application for caries prevention has been proven, the fluoride (Fl) and silver (Ag) ion concentrations of e-SDF for use in treating DH have yet to be standardized. The aim of this study is to determine and compare the Fl and Ag ion concentrations released from two commercially available 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solutions.
The two most common commercially available 38% SDF solution brands, namely Advantage Arrest and e-SDF were used. Two drops of each of these solutions were taken in three beakers and diluted with distilled water. The Fl ion concentration was evaluated using a calibrated ion-specific electrode. The free Ag ion concentration was assessed using an atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).
Release of Ag ions shows that on days 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7, concentration (mg/L) was higher in the Advantage Arrest group but is statistically nonsignificant. On days 3 and 4, it is higher in an e-SDF group with a -value of 1.085 and 0.243 and is statistically nonsignificant. Release of Fl ion showed that in comparison to the baseline, it was more with Advantage Arrest on days 2, 4, and 7 with a -value of -3.766, -0.999, and 0.347 and on day 2 was statistically significant. On days 3, 5, and 6 Fl ion release from baseline was more with e-SDF in comparison with Advantage Arrest but statistically insignificant.
The AAS analysis as well as the ion chromatography showed that the Ag and Fl ion release respectively on days 1-7 from e-SDF was similar to the one seen in the case of Advantage Arrest.
This helps dentists choose among different brands of the same commercially available 38% SDF solutions depending on the cost and availability of the product.
Kamath P, Kamath P, P AN, Evaluation of Fluoride and Silver Ion Concentrations in e-Silver Diamine Fluoride and Advantage Arrest: An Ion Chromatography and Atomic Absorption Spectrometer Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1141-1145.
牙本质敏感症(DH)的特征是由于牙本质暴露而产生尖锐的刺痛,治疗这种疼痛最常用的方法是使用脱敏剂封闭牙本质小管。电子氟化亚锡(e-SDF)(印度孟买的Kids-e-Dental公司生产)是印度市场上一种市售的38%氟化亚锡溶液。尽管其在预防龋齿方面的应用已得到证实,但用于治疗DH的e-SDF中的氟(Fl)和银(Ag)离子浓度尚未标准化。本研究的目的是测定并比较两种市售38%氟化亚锡(SDF)溶液释放的Fl和Ag离子浓度。
使用了两种最常见的市售38% SDF溶液品牌,即Advantage Arrest和e-SDF。在三个烧杯中分别取两滴每种溶液,并用蒸馏水稀释。使用校准的离子特异性电极评估Fl离子浓度。使用原子吸收光谱法(AAS)评估游离Ag离子浓度。
Ag离子释放情况表明,在第1、2、5、6和7天,Advantage Arrest组的浓度(mg/L)较高,但无统计学意义。在第3天和第4天,e-SDF组的浓度较高,t值分别为1.085和0.243,无统计学意义。Fl离子释放情况表明,与基线相比,Advantage Arrest在第2、4和7天释放更多,t值分别为 -3.766、-0.999和0.347,第2天具有统计学意义。在第3、5和6天,与Advantage Arrest相比,e-SDF从基线释放的Fl离子更多,但无统计学意义。
AAS分析以及离子色谱显示,e-SDF在第1 - 7天分别释放的Ag和Fl离子与Advantage Arrest相似。
这有助于牙医根据产品的成本和可得性,在同一市售38% SDF溶液的不同品牌之间进行选择。
Kamath P, Kamath P, P AN, 电子氟化亚锡和Advantage Arrest中氟化物和银离子浓度的评估:一项离子色谱和原子吸收光谱仪研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024;17(10):1141 - 1145。