• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测初次全膝关节置换术后30天再次手术情况:机器学习模型优于美国外科医师学会风险计算器。

Predicting 30-day reoperation following primary total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model outperforms the ACS risk calculator.

作者信息

Chen Tony Lin-Wei, Buddhiraju Anirudh, Bacevich Blake M, Seo Henry Hojoon, Shimizu Michelle Riyo, Kwon Young-Min

机构信息

Bioengineering Lab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 Apr;63(4):1131-1141. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03258-x. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11517-024-03258-x
PMID:39652282
Abstract

The ACS risk calculator (ARC) has proven less effective in predicting patient-specific risk of early reoperation after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), compromising care quality and cost efficiency. This study compared the performance of a machine learning (ML) model and ARC in predicting 30-day reoperation after primary TKA using a national-scale dataset. Data of 366,151 TKAs were acquired from the ACS-NSQIP database. A random forest model was derived using ARC build-in parameters from the training dataset via techniques of hyperparameter optimization and cross-validation. The predictive performance of random forest and ARC was evaluated by metrics of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility using the testing dataset. The ML model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration (AUC: 0.72, slope: 1.18, intercept: - 0.14, Brier score: 0.012), outperforming ARC in all metrics (AUC: 0.51, slope: - 0.01, intercept: 0.01, Brier score: 0.135) including clinical utility measured by decision curve analyses. Age (> 67 years) and BMI (> 34 kg/m) were the important predictors of reoperation. This study suggests the superiority of ML models in identifying individualized 30-day reoperation risk following TKA. ML models may be an adjunct prediction tool in enhancing patient-specific risk stratification and postoperative care management.

摘要

美国外科医师学会风险计算器(ARC)已被证明在预测初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者特定的早期再次手术风险方面效果较差,这会影响护理质量和成本效益。本研究使用全国规模的数据集,比较了机器学习(ML)模型和ARC在预测初次TKA后30天再次手术方面的性能。从美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库中获取了366,151例TKA的数据。通过超参数优化和交叉验证技术,使用训练数据集中ARC的内置参数导出了一个随机森林模型。使用测试数据集,通过区分度、校准度和临床效用指标评估随机森林和ARC的预测性能。ML模型显示出良好的区分度和校准度(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.72,斜率:1.18,截距:-0.14,布里尔评分:0.012),在所有指标上均优于ARC(AUC:0.51,斜率:-0.01,截距:0.01,布里尔评分:0.135),包括通过决策曲线分析衡量的临床效用。年龄(>67岁)和体重指数(BMI,>34kg/m²)是再次手术的重要预测因素。本研究表明ML模型在识别TKA术后个体化30天再次手术风险方面具有优越性。ML模型可能是一种辅助预测工具,可用于加强患者特定的风险分层和术后护理管理。

相似文献

1
Predicting 30-day reoperation following primary total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model outperforms the ACS risk calculator.预测初次全膝关节置换术后30天再次手术情况:机器学习模型优于美国外科医师学会风险计算器。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 Apr;63(4):1131-1141. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03258-x. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?机器学习算法能否预测丹麦膝关节置换登记处的早期翻修 TKA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343.
3
Machine learning model outperforms the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non-home discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty.在预测初次全膝关节置换术后非家庭出院方面,机器学习模型的表现优于美国心脏病学会(ACS)风险计算器。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Mar;33(3):977-986. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12492. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
4
Prediction of 30-Day Mortality Following Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Machine Learning Algorithms Outperform CARDE-B, 5-Item, and 6-Item Modified Frailty Index Risk Scores.翻修全髋关节和膝关节置换术后 30 天死亡率的预测:机器学习算法优于 CARDE-B、5 项和 6 项改良衰弱指数风险评分。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Nov;39(11):2824-2830. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.056. Epub 2024 May 24.
5
Predicting 30-day unplanned hospital readmission after revision total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model analysis of a national patient cohort.预测全膝关节翻修术后 30 天内非计划性再入院:全国患者队列的机器学习模型分析。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Jul;62(7):2073-2086. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03054-7. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
6
Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty.在预测翻修关节成形术方面,机器学习的表现并未优于传统的竞争风险模型。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1472-1482. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003018. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Generalizability of machine learning models predicting 30-day unplanned readmission after primary total knee arthroplasty using a nationally representative database.使用全国代表性数据库预测初次全膝关节置换术后 30 天内非计划性再入院的机器学习模型的泛化能力。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Aug;62(8):2333-2341. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03075-2. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Can machine learning models predict prolonged length of hospital stay following primary total knee arthroplasty based on a national patient cohort data?基于全国患者队列数据,机器学习模型能否预测初次全膝关节置换术后住院时间延长?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Dec;143(12):7185-7193. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05013-7. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
9
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
10
The ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator Is a Fair Predictor of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)风险计算器是急性人工关节感染的合理预测指标。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1643-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4717-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes.因果机器学习在预测治疗结果中的应用。
Nat Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):958-968. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02902-1. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Predicting 30-day unplanned hospital readmission after revision total knee arthroplasty: machine learning model analysis of a national patient cohort.预测全膝关节翻修术后 30 天内非计划性再入院:全国患者队列的机器学习模型分析。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Jul;62(7):2073-2086. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03054-7. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
3
Higher Risk of Reoperation after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young and Elderly Patients.
年轻和老年患者全膝关节置换术后再次手术的风险更高。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 2;16(21):7012. doi: 10.3390/ma16217012.
4
Validation of Machine Learning Model Performance in Predicting Blood Transfusion After Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.机器学习模型在预测初次和翻修全髋关节置换术后输血中的性能验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Oct;38(10):1959-1966. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Internal and External Validation of the Generalizability of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Non-home Discharge Disposition Following Primary Total Knee Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习算法在预测初次全膝关节置换术后非居家出院处置中的可推广性的内部和外部验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Oct;38(10):1973-1981. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.065. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
6
Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty.使用机器学习预测全关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞和大出血事件。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 7;13(1):2197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26032-1.
7
A Machine Learning Framework for Assessing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Replacement.一种用于评估髋关节或膝关节置换患者静脉血栓栓塞风险的机器学习框架。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2022 Oct 25;6(4):423-441. doi: 10.1007/s41666-022-00121-2. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Inaccurate Risk Assessment by the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Aortic Surgery.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)风险计算器在主动脉手术中进行的风险评估不准确。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 20;10(22):5426. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225426.
9
The ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator is a poor predictor of postoperative complications in patients undergoing oncologic distal femoral replacement.ACS-NSQIP 手术风险计算器预测接受肿瘤性股骨远端置换术患者术后并发症的效果较差。
Knee. 2021 Dec;33:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
10
Evolution of Risk Calculators and the Dawn of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Patient Complications.风险计算器的发展与人工智能在预测患者并发症中的应用
Surg Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;101(1):97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Nov 2.