Seang Kennarey, Vogt Florian, Ky Sovathana, Ouk Vichea, Kaldor John, Vallely Andrew John, Saphonn Vonthanak
Grant Management Office, University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e084555. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084555.
Globally, there is a lack of evidence regarding access to and utilisation of antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs). This might hinder public health interventions to increase testing. We conducted a survey to understand access to and utilisation of COVID-19 Ag-RDT among residents in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
This is a representative household survey using linear regression models with random effects to account for clustering and a logistic model with random effects to assess factors associated with Ag-RDT access.
We conducted the study in 10 villages in Phnom Penh between August and mid-September 2022.
We enrolled one member per household (n=280), aged between 18 and 65 years.
Both access and utilisation were defined at the individual level (self-reports). We defined access as having undergone COVID-19 rapid testing within 6 months and utilisation as having administered this test (to themselves or others) within 12 months, prior to the study interview.
In a clustering-adjusted linear model, access to Ag-RDTs among the general population from the 10 villages was 34% (n=95) and utilisation was 28% (n=77). Price and advice from the pharmacist were commonly reported to be the main selection criteria for Ag-RDTs, with 41% (n=111) and 62% (n=175), respectively. In the logistic model, those with higher educational attainment were more likely to have access to the Ag-RDT compared with those with lower education levels (adjusted OR4.42, 95% CI 1.82 to 10.74).
Unfamiliarity with Ag-RDT tests and low education levels negatively affect access and utilisation of Ag-RDTs among the general population in Phnom Penh.
在全球范围内,关于抗原快速诊断检测(Ag-RDT)的获取和使用情况缺乏证据。这可能会阻碍旨在增加检测的公共卫生干预措施。我们开展了一项调查,以了解柬埔寨金边居民对新冠病毒Ag-RDT的获取和使用情况。
这是一项具有代表性的家庭调查,使用带随机效应的线性回归模型来考虑聚类情况,并使用带随机效应的逻辑模型来评估与Ag-RDT获取相关的因素。
我们于2022年8月至9月中旬在金边的10个村庄开展了这项研究。
我们每户招募一名成员(n = 280),年龄在18至65岁之间。
获取和使用情况均在个体层面(自我报告)进行定义。我们将获取定义为在研究访谈前6个月内接受过新冠病毒快速检测,将使用定义为在研究访谈前12个月内(给自己或他人)进行过此项检测。
在经过聚类调整的线性模型中,来自10个村庄的普通人群中,Ag-RDT的获取率为34%(n = 95),使用率为28%(n = 77)。价格和药剂师的建议通常被报告为Ag-RDT的主要选择标准,分别为41%(n = 111)和62%(n = 175)。在逻辑模型中,与教育程度较低的人相比,教育程度较高的人更有可能获取Ag-RDT(调整后的比值比为4.42,95%置信区间为1.82至10.74)。
对Ag-RDT检测不熟悉以及教育水平较低对金边普通人群获取和使用Ag-RDT产生负面影响。