Lee Youngin, Bang Seunguk, Chung Jihyun, Chae Min Suk, Shin Jungwon
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb;78(1):30-38. doi: 10.4097/kja.24595. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
Distal nerve block approaches have been explored to reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) more effectively than interscalene block (ISB). However, these approaches are associated with a high incidence of HDP. The costoclavicular block (CCB) provides effective analgesia while reducing HDP. Here, we hypothesized that CCB would decrease the incidence of HDP compared to ISB while still providing effective pain relief after surgery.
Seventy patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided CCB (n = 35) or ISB (n = 35). Each group received 0.2% ropivacaine (20 ml CCB, 10 ml ISB). The primary outcome was the incidence of HDP, as measured using M-mode ultrasound. Diaphragmatic excursion, pulmonary function test results, opioid consumption, and pain scores were evaluated.
Sixty-six patients were included. CCB group had a significantly lower incidence of HDP than those in the ISB group (5.9% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001). The diaphragmatic excursion reduction was significantly more in the ISB (3.87 cm) group than in the CCB (0.25 cm) group (P < 0.001). The decrease in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline was significantly greater in the ISB. There was no significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups during the entire postoperative period.
Compared with ISB, CCB significantly reduced the incidence of HDP while maintaining effective analgesia and causing less pulmonary function impairment. CCB may be a viable option for diaphragmatic-sparing analgesia after shoulder surgery.
人们一直在探索远端神经阻滞方法,以期比肌间沟阻滞(ISB)更有效地减少半膈肌麻痹(HDP)。然而,这些方法与HDP的高发生率相关。锁骨下阻滞(CCB)在减少HDP的同时可提供有效的镇痛。在此,我们假设与ISB相比,CCB可降低HDP的发生率,同时在术后仍能提供有效的疼痛缓解。
70例行关节镜下肩袖修补术的患者被随机分配接受超声引导下的CCB(n = 35)或ISB(n = 35)。每组均接受0.2%的罗哌卡因(CCB组20 ml,ISB组10 ml)。主要结局是使用M型超声测量的HDP发生率。评估膈肌活动度、肺功能测试结果、阿片类药物消耗量和疼痛评分。
纳入66例患者。CCB组的HDP发生率显著低于ISB组(5.9%对84.4%,P < 0.001)。ISB组(3.87 cm)的膈肌活动度降低明显大于CCB组(0.25 cm)(P < 0.001)。ISB组从基线开始的用力肺活量和1秒用力呼气量的下降明显更大。两组在整个术后期间的阿片类药物消耗量无显著差异。
与ISB相比,CCB显著降低了HDP的发生率,同时维持了有效的镇痛并减少了肺功能损害。CCB可能是肩部手术后保留膈肌镇痛的一个可行选择。