Handoyo Sofik
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Dipati Ukur 35, Bandung, 40132, Indonesia.
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 22;10(23):e40637. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40637. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
This study examines how public governance, including voice and accountability, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption, affects national environmental performance in various countries. It also looks at how gross national income moderates the relationship between public governance and environmental performance. The findings show that political stability and regulatory quality positively influence environmental performance at the national level. In contrast, voice and accountability, government effectiveness, and the rule of law negatively correlate. Furthermore, in wealthier countries, voice and accountability, government effectiveness, and the rule of law enhance national environmental performance, while political stability and regulatory quality benefits diminish as income increases. These results emphasize the importance of the economic context in the interaction between public governance and environmental performance, indicating that wealthier nations are more capable of leveraging public governance for environmental improvements. The study offers crucial insights for policymakers aiming to align public governance reforms with environmental objectives, particularly in countries at varying economic development stages.
本研究考察了包括发言权与问责制、政治稳定性、政府效能、监管质量、法治以及腐败控制在内的公共治理如何影响各国的国家环境绩效。它还研究了国民总收入如何调节公共治理与环境绩效之间的关系。研究结果表明，政治稳定性和监管质量对国家层面的环境绩效有积极影响。相比之下，发言权与问责制、政府效能和法治呈负相关。此外，在较富裕的国家，发言权与问责制、政府效能和法治会提升国家环境绩效，而随着收入增加，政治稳定性和监管质量带来的益处会减少。这些结果强调了经济背景在公共治理与环境绩效相互作用中的重要性，表明较富裕的国家更有能力利用公共治理来改善环境。该研究为旨在使公共治理改革与环境目标相一致的政策制定者提供了关键见解，尤其是在处于不同经济发展阶段的国家。
