• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治理、国内生产总值、不平等、人口规模或国家面积与卫生干预措施的覆盖范围和公平性是否相关?来自80个国家的横断面调查的生态分析。

Is governance, gross domestic product, inequality, population size or country surface area associated with coverage and equity of health interventions? Ecological analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 80 countries.

作者信息

Wehrmeister Fernando C, da Silva Inácio Crochemore M, Barros Aluisio J D, Victora Cesar G

机构信息

International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Oct 31;2(4):e000437. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000437. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000437
PMID:29225951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5717925/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess associations between national characteristics, including governance indicators, with a proxy for universal health coverage in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH).

DESIGN

Ecological analysis based on data from national standardised cross-sectional surveys.

SETTING

Low-income and middle-income countries with a Demographic and Health Survey or a Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey since 2005.

PARTICIPANTS

1 246 710 mothers and 2 129 212 children from 80 national surveys.

EXPOSURES OF INTEREST

Gross domestic product (GDP), country surface area, population, Gini index and six governance indicators (control of corruption, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and voice and accountability).

MAIN OUTCOMES

Levels and inequality in the composite coverage index (CCI), a weighted average of eight RMNCH interventions. Relative and absolute inequalities were measured through the concentration index (CIX) and slope index of inequality (SII) for CCI, respectively.

RESULTS

The average values of CCI (70.5% (SD=13.3)), CIX (5.3 (SD=5.1)) and mean slope index (19.8 (SD=14.7)) were calculated. In the unadjusted analysis, all governance variables and GDP were positively associated with the CCI and negatively with inequalities. Country surface showed inverse associations with both inequality indices. After adjustment, among the governance indicators, only political stability and absence of violence was directly related to CCI (β=6.3; 95% CI 3.6 to 9.1; p<0.001) and inversely associated with relative (CIX; β=-1.4; 95% CI -2.4 to -0.4; p=0.007) and absolute (SII; β=-5.3; 95% CI -8.9 to -1.7; p=0.005) inequalities. The strongest associations with governance indicators were found in the poorest wealth quintile. Similar patterns were observed for GDP. Country surface area was inversely related to inequalities on CCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels and equity in RMNCH interventions are positively associated with political stability and absence of violence, and with GDP, and inversely associated with country surface area.

摘要

目的

评估包括治理指标在内的国家特征与生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康(RMNCH)方面全民健康覆盖指标之间的关联。

设计

基于国家标准横断面调查数据的生态分析。

背景

2005年以来开展过人口与健康调查或多指标类集调查的低收入和中等收入国家。

参与者

来自80项国家调查的1246710名母亲和2129212名儿童。

感兴趣的暴露因素

国内生产总值(GDP)、国家面积、人口、基尼指数以及六项治理指标(控制腐败、政治稳定与无暴力、政府效能、监管质量、法治以及发言权与问责制)。

主要结局

综合覆盖指数(CCI)的水平和不平等情况,该指数是八项RMNCH干预措施的加权平均值。通过CCI的集中指数(CIX)和不平等斜率指数(SII)分别衡量相对不平等和绝对不平等。

结果

计算出CCI的平均值为70.5%(标准差=13.3),CIX为5.3(标准差=5.1),平均斜率指数为19.8(标准差=14.7)。在未调整分析中,所有治理变量和GDP均与CCI呈正相关,与不平等呈负相关。国家面积与两个不平等指数均呈负相关。调整后,在治理指标中,只有政治稳定与无暴力与CCI直接相关(β=6.3;95%置信区间3.6至9.1;p<0.001),与相对不平等(CIX;β=-1.4;95%置信区间-2.4至-0.4;p=0.007)和绝对不平等(SII;β=-5.3;95%置信区间-8.9至-1.7;p=0.005)呈负相关。在最贫困的财富五分位数中发现与治理指标的关联最强。GDP也观察到类似模式。国家面积与CCI的不平等呈负相关。

结论

RMNCH干预措施的水平和公平性与政治稳定和无暴力以及GDP呈正相关,与国家面积呈负相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/5717925/7d8d6a6d4205/bmjgh-2017-000437f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/5717925/b5dcb907e4a6/bmjgh-2017-000437f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/5717925/7d8d6a6d4205/bmjgh-2017-000437f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/5717925/b5dcb907e4a6/bmjgh-2017-000437f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adad/5717925/7d8d6a6d4205/bmjgh-2017-000437f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Is governance, gross domestic product, inequality, population size or country surface area associated with coverage and equity of health interventions? Ecological analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 80 countries.治理、国内生产总值、不平等、人口规模或国家面积与卫生干预措施的覆盖范围和公平性是否相关?来自80个国家的横断面调查的生态分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Oct 31;2(4):e000437. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000437. eCollection 2017.
2
Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的提供渠道和社会经济不平等:对低收入和中等收入国家的 36 项横断面调查的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1101-e1109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Coverage and inequalities in maternal and child health interventions in Afghanistan.阿富汗孕产妇和儿童健康干预措施的覆盖范围及不平等情况。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 12;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):797. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3406-1.
4
Measuring universal health coverage in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: An update of the composite coverage index.衡量生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康方面的全民健康覆盖:综合覆盖指数的更新。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0232350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232350. eCollection 2020.
5
Are the poorest poor being left behind? Estimating global inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health.最贫困的人群是否被落下了?估计生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康方面的全球不平等。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 26;5(1):e002229. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002229. eCollection 2020.
6
Going deeper with health equity measurement: how much more can surveys reveal about inequalities in health intervention coverage and mortality in Zambia?深入探讨健康公平衡量标准:调查在多大程度上能揭示赞比亚在卫生干预措施覆盖范围和死亡率方面的不平等?
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jun 2;22(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01901-x.
7
Level of inequality and the role of governance indicators in the coverage of reproductive maternal and child healthcare services: Findings from India.不平等程度与治理指标在生殖孕产妇和儿童卫生保健服务覆盖方面的作用:来自印度的发现。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0258244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258244. eCollection 2021.
8
Wealth and education-related inequalities in the utilisation of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions within scheduled tribes in India: an analysis of Odisha and Jharkhand.印度 scheduled tribes 中生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施利用方面的财富和教育相关不平等:奥里萨邦和贾坎德邦的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):1605. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18857-4.
9
Is women's empowerment associated with coverage of RMNCH interventions in low- and middle-income countries? An analysis using a survey-based empowerment indicator, the SWPER.妇女赋权是否与中低收入国家的 RMNCH 干预措施的覆盖范围有关?利用基于调查的赋权指标 SWPER 进行的分析。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 1;11:04015. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04015.
10
Inequalities in full vaccination coverage based on maternal education and wealth quintiles among children aged 12-23 months: further analysis of national cross-sectional surveys of six South Asian countries.12-23 月龄儿童按母亲受教育程度和财富五分位数划分的完全疫苗接种覆盖率不平等:对六个南亚国家的国家横断面调查的进一步分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e046971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046971.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing and adjusting for bias in ecological analysis using multiple sample datasets.使用多个样本数据集评估生态分析中的偏倚并进行调整。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02552-y.
2
Relationship between employment and quality of life and self-perceived health in people with spinal cord injury: an international comparative study based on the InSCI Community Survey.脊髓损伤患者的就业与生活质量及自我感知健康之间的关系:一项基于国际脊髓损伤社区调查的国际比较研究
Spinal Cord. 2024 Mar;62(3):110-116. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00953-8. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
3
Level of inequality and the role of governance indicators in the coverage of reproductive maternal and child healthcare services: Findings from India.

本文引用的文献

1
Country-level predictors of vaccination coverage and inequalities in Gavi-supported countries.全球疫苗免疫联盟支持国家中疫苗接种覆盖率及不平等现象的国家层面预测因素。
Vaccine. 2017 Apr 25;35(18):2479-2488. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
Summary indices for monitoring universal coverage in maternal and child health care.监测孕产妇和儿童保健全面覆盖情况的汇总指标。
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):903-912. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.173138. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
Countdown to 2015: a decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn, and child survival.
不平等程度与治理指标在生殖孕产妇和儿童卫生保健服务覆盖方面的作用:来自印度的发现。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0258244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258244. eCollection 2021.
4
Sociodemographic inequities in nurturing care for early childhood development across Brazilian municipalities.巴西各城市幼儿发展养育照护的社会人口不公平现象。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Mar;18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e13232. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13232. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
Is women's empowerment associated with coverage of RMNCH interventions in low- and middle-income countries? An analysis using a survey-based empowerment indicator, the SWPER.妇女赋权是否与中低收入国家的 RMNCH 干预措施的覆盖范围有关?利用基于调查的赋权指标 SWPER 进行的分析。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 1;11:04015. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04015.
6
Assessing the efficiency of countries in making progress towards universal health coverage: a data envelopment analysis of 172 countries.评估各国在实现全民健康覆盖方面取得进展的效率:对 172 个国家的数据包络分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002992.
7
COVID-19 Outbreak, Mitigation, and Governance in High Prevalent Countries.高流行国家的 COVID-19 爆发、缓解和治理。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Sep 17;86(1):119. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3011.
8
Large and persistent subnational inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health intervention coverage in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区在生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的覆盖范围方面存在较大且持续的次国家级不平等现象。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 26;5(1):e002232. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002232. eCollection 2020.
9
Are the poorest poor being left behind? Estimating global inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health.最贫困的人群是否被落下了?估计生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康方面的全球不平等。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 26;5(1):e002229. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002229. eCollection 2020.
10
Lenses and levels: the why, what and how of measuring health system drivers of women's, children's and adolescents' health with a governance focus.透镜与层面:聚焦治理,衡量影响妇女、儿童及青少年健康的卫生系统驱动因素的原因、内容及方式。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 24;4(Suppl 4):e001316. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001316. eCollection 2019.
《2015年倒计时:追踪孕产妇、新生儿和儿童生存进展的十年》
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2049-59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00519-X. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
4
Did Equity of Reproductive and Maternal Health Service Coverage Increase during the MDG Era? An Analysis of Trends and Determinants across 74 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.千年发展目标时代生殖与孕产妇健康服务覆盖的公平性有所提升吗?对74个低收入和中等收入国家的趋势及决定因素的分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0134905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134905. eCollection 2015.
5
Confronting stillbirths and newborn deaths in areas of conflict and political instability: a neglected global imperative.应对冲突和政治不稳定地区的死产和新生儿死亡问题:一项被忽视的全球紧迫任务。
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2015 Aug;35(3):220-6. doi: 10.1179/2046905515Y.0000000027. Epub 2015 May 2.
6
The ethical and policy implications of research on income inequality and child well-being.研究收入不平等与儿童福祉的伦理和政策影响。
Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135 Suppl 2:S39-47. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3549E.
7
Changes in child mortality over time across the wealth gradient in less-developed countries.欠发达国家不同财富水平群体儿童死亡率随时间的变化情况。
Pediatrics. 2014 Dec;134(6):e1551-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2320. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
8
Governance matters: an ecological association between governance and child mortality.治理至关重要:治理与儿童死亡率之间的生态关联
Int Health. 2014 Sep;6(3):249-57. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihu018. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
9
Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation.《2035年全球健康:一代人时间内的世界融合》
Lancet. 2013 Dec 7;382(9908):1898-955. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62105-4. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
10
Measuring coverage in MNCH: determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions.测量母婴、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的覆盖情况:确定和解释覆盖不平等。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001390. Epub 2013 May 7.