Suppr超能文献

提高流行病学研究作为化学风险评估关键证据的效用。

Increasing the utility of epidemiologic studies as key evidence in chemical risk assessment.

作者信息

Schaefer Heather R, Vincent Melissa J, Burns Carol J, Lange Sabine S

机构信息

US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), College Park, MD 20740, United States.

ToxStrategies, LLC, Asheville, NC 28801, United States.

出版信息

Toxicol Sci. 2025 Feb 1;203(2):166-170. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae134.

Abstract

The Society of Toxicology 2024 meeting assembled risk assessors, epidemiologists, and toxicologists to discuss the utility of integrating epidemiologic data into the derivation of reference values. Advantages of the use of epidemiologic evidence include (i) human relevance; (ii) increased likelihood that exposure levels are relevant to risk assessment; and (iii) incorporation of uncertainties attributed to co-exposures or other population-based considerations. The workshop panelists discussed the challenges of incorporating epidemiologic evidence due to uncertain exposure measurements, confounding, heterogeneity, and inherent study design limitations. Capturing uncertainty is a critical step. In summary, epidemiologic evidence can be a valuable tool for risk analysis. This workshop brief captures constructive considerations from practitioners in the field that can increase the utility of epidemiologic studies in chemical risk assessment and harmonize the approach for use in dose-response assessment that will ultimately reduce uncertainty related to chemical exposures.

摘要

毒理学学会2024年会议召集了风险评估人员、流行病学家和毒理学家,讨论将流行病学数据纳入参考值推导的实用性。使用流行病学证据的优点包括:(i)与人类相关;(ii)暴露水平与风险评估相关的可能性增加;以及(iii)纳入归因于共同暴露或其他基于人群的考虑因素的不确定性。研讨会小组成员讨论了由于暴露测量不确定、混杂、异质性和固有研究设计局限性而在纳入流行病学证据方面面临的挑战。捕捉不确定性是关键一步。总之,流行病学证据可以成为风险分析的宝贵工具。本研讨会简报收集了该领域从业者的建设性意见,这些意见可提高流行病学研究在化学风险评估中的实用性,并协调剂量反应评估中的使用方法,最终减少与化学暴露相关的不确定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f5b/11775416/05281c775814/kfae134f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验