Yousif Nada, Bain Peter G, Nandi Dipankar, Borisyuk Roman
School of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024 Dec 20;11(1). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad9c7d.
Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders is a well-established clinical treatment. Over the last few decades, over 200,000 people have been treated by DBS worldwide for several neurological conditions, including Parkinson's disease and Essential Tremor. DBS involves implanting electrodes into disorder-specific targets in the brain and applying an electric current. Although the hardware has developed in recent years, the clinically used stimulation pattern has remained as a regular frequency square pulse. Recent studies have suggested that phase-locking, coordinated reset or irregular patterns may be as or more effective at desynchronising the pathological neural activity. Such studies have shown efficacy using detailed neuron models or highly simplified networks and considered one frequency band. We previously described a population level model which generates oscillatory activity in both the beta band (20 Hz) and the tremor band (4 Hz). Here we use this model to look at the impact of applying regular, irregular and phase dependent bursts of stimulation, and show how this influences both tremor- and beta-band activity. We found that bursts are as or more effective at suppressing the pathological oscillations compared to continuous DBS. Importantly however, at higher amplitudes we found that the stimulus drove the network activity, as seen previously. Strikingly, this suppression was most apparent for the tremor band oscillations, with beta band pathological activity being more resistant to the burst stimulation compared to continuous, conventional DBS. Furthermore, our simulations showed that phase-locked bursts of stimulation did not convey much improvement on regular bursts of oscillation. Using a genetic algorithm optimisation approach to find the best stimulation parameters for regular, irregular and phase-locked bursts, we confirmed that tremor band oscillations could be more readily suppressed. Our results allow exploration of stimulation mechanisms at the network level to formulate testable predictions regarding parameter settings in DBS.
传统的用于治疗运动障碍的深部脑刺激(DBS)是一种成熟的临床治疗方法。在过去几十年里,全球有超过20万人因包括帕金森病和特发性震颤在内的多种神经系统疾病接受了DBS治疗。DBS包括将电极植入大脑中特定疾病的靶点并施加电流。尽管近年来硬件有所发展,但临床上使用的刺激模式仍然是规则频率的方波脉冲。最近的研究表明,锁相、协调重置或不规则模式在使病理性神经活动去同步化方面可能同样有效或更有效。此类研究使用详细的神经元模型或高度简化的网络并考虑一个频段,已显示出疗效。我们之前描述了一个群体水平的模型,该模型在β频段(20赫兹)和震颤频段(4赫兹)都能产生振荡活动。在此,我们使用这个模型来研究施加规则、不规则和相位依赖的刺激脉冲的影响,并展示这如何影响震颤频段和β频段的活动。我们发现,与连续DBS相比,脉冲在抑制病理性振荡方面同样有效或更有效。然而重要的是,在较高幅度时,我们发现刺激驱动了网络活动,正如之前所观察到的。令人惊讶的是,这种抑制在震颤频段振荡中最为明显,与连续的传统DBS相比,β频段的病理性活动对脉冲刺激更具抗性。此外,我们的模拟表明,锁相刺激脉冲与规则的振荡脉冲相比并没有带来太多改善。使用遗传算法优化方法来寻找规则、不规则和锁相脉冲的最佳刺激参数,我们证实震颤频段振荡更容易被抑制。我们的结果有助于在网络层面探索刺激机制,以制定关于DBS参数设置的可测试预测。