Suppr超能文献

预测烧伤患者的能量消耗。

Predicting energy expenditures in burned patients.

作者信息

Turner W W, Ireton C S, Hunt J L, Baxter C R

出版信息

J Trauma. 1985 Jan;25(1):11-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198501000-00002.

Abstract

Daily caloric requirements in patients with major burns are frequently estimated using the Curreri formula (25 X body weight (kg) + 40 X % BSA burned). In nonburned patients modifications of the Harris-Benedict formulas have been used to estimate energy requirements. These equations have not been validated against measured energy expenditures in burned patients. Thirty-five patients with second- and third-degree burns covering from 10 to 75% of the body surface area underwent assessments of energy expenditures by indirect calorimetry and by the Curreri and Harris-Benedict formulas. The mean energy expenditure calculated from the Harris-Benedict formulas (BEE) underestimated the mean measured energy expenditure (MEE) by 23% (p less than 0.001), while the mean energy expenditure calculated from the Curreri formula (CEE) overestimated the mean MEE by 58% (p less than 0.001). There were significant correlations between the MEE, BEE, and CEE. In patients with burns greater than 20% of the body surface area, the correlation between MEE and BEE was higher than that found with the Curreri formula.

摘要

大面积烧伤患者的每日热量需求通常使用柯勒里公式(25×体重(千克)+40×烧伤体表面积百分比)来估算。对于未烧伤的患者,已使用哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式的修正版来估算能量需求。这些公式尚未在烧伤患者中根据实测能量消耗进行验证。35例二度和三度烧伤面积占体表面积10%至75%的患者接受了间接测热法以及柯勒里公式和哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式的能量消耗评估。根据哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式计算出的平均能量消耗(基础能量消耗,BEE)比实测平均能量消耗(MEE)低23%(p<0.001),而根据柯勒里公式计算出的平均能量消耗(CEE)比平均MEE高58%(p<0.001)。MEE、BEE和CEE之间存在显著相关性。在烧伤面积大于体表面积20%的患者中,MEE与BEE之间的相关性高于与柯勒里公式的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验