Suppr超能文献

危重症外科患者的全肠外营养:固定热量补充与个性化热量补充

Total parenteral nutrition in critically ill surgical patients: fixed vs tailored caloric replacement.

作者信息

van Lanschot J J, Feenstra B W, Looijen R, Vermeij C G, Bruining H A

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1987;13(1):46-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00263557.

Abstract

In critically ill patients accurate measurement of total energy expenditure (TEE) is possible by means of continuous indirect calorimetry. Since in many ICUs the necessary equipment is not available, the Harris-Benedict formula (HB) is frequently used to calculate TEE. Supplemental application of a clinical correction factor (HBc) has been advised. In this study we assessed the reliability of both methods of calculation and of a standard nutritional regimen, all three compared to the calorimetrically measured TEE (gold standard). Although the basic HB-formula did not perform better than the standard regimen, significantly better results were obtained by supplemental application of the clinical correction factor (HBc). It is left undecided, whether or not indirect calorimetry is actually to be preferred in daily clinical practice.

摘要

在重症患者中,通过连续间接测热法可以准确测量总能量消耗(TEE)。由于许多重症监护病房(ICU)没有必要的设备,因此常使用哈里斯-本尼迪克特公式(HB)来计算TEE。有人建议补充应用临床校正因子(HBc)。在本研究中,我们评估了这两种计算方法以及一种标准营养方案的可靠性,所有这三种方法均与通过测热法测量的TEE(金标准)进行比较。尽管基本的HB公式并不比标准方案表现更好,但补充应用临床校正因子(HBc)可获得明显更好的结果。间接测热法在日常临床实践中是否真的更可取,尚无定论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验