Suppr超能文献

采用角膜塑形术与未采用角膜塑形术时驾驶视觉功能的昼夜变化:一项多中心研究。

Diurnal variation of visual functions for driving with and without orthokeratology: A multicenter study.

作者信息

Bandlitz Stefan, Gruhl Jessica, Oesker Gunther, Lachenmaier Daniel, Giepen Carsten, Reck Barbara, Hoppe Oliver, Lagrèze Wolf A, Wolffsohn James S

机构信息

College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Höhere Fachschule für Augenoptik und Optometrie, Köln, Germany.

Avermann Contactlinsen, Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2025 Apr;48(2):102345. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102345. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate orthokeratology-related diurnal variations in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, mesopic (twilight) vision, and glare sensitivity, and to verify compliance with requirements for driver licensing.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, controlled study, fifty myopic (range, -1.00 to -4.50 D) and non-presbyopic glasses or soft contact lens wearers (age range, 16-39 years) were fitted with orthokeratology (OK) contact lenses. Before and after completion of OK lens fitting, measurements of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, mesopic vision and glare sensitivity were performed at three times of the day, morning, afternoon and evening using a standardized binocular vision testing device (Oculus Binoptometer 4P). Monocular and binocular visual acuity were tested according to ISO 8596 and compared to requirements of cars and motorcycles drivers in different countries.

RESULTS

Compared to the prior correction, binocular visual acuity (logMAR) with orthokeratology was statistically significant better in the morning (0.04 ± 0.12; p < 0.05) and afternoon (0.04 ± 0.10; p < 0.05), while the difference was not statistically significant in the evening (p = 0.512). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity in the morning (p = 0.813), afternoon (p = 0.742) or evening (p = 0.945). For both mesopic vision and glare sensitivity, there was no statistically significant difference between the contrast levels achieved with orthokeratology compared to the prior correction in the morning (p = 0.083; p = 1.000), afternoon (p = 0.054; p = 0.125) or evening (p = 0.195; p = 0.635). With orthokeratology, no statistically significant diurnal variation was found for binocular visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, mesopic vision or glare sensitivity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide evidence, that visual functions of OK lens wearers are stable throughout the day and comparable to the prior correction. Although the visual standards for driving are not uniform within countries, the requirements for visual acuity are met in all of the countries. Mesopic vision and glare sensitivity, which are suggested as other aspects to influence driving performance, also appear to be constant over the course of the day.

摘要

目的

研究角膜塑形术相关的视力、对比敏感度、中间视觉(黄昏视觉)和眩光敏感度的昼夜变化,并验证是否符合驾驶执照要求。

方法

在这项前瞻性、多中心、对照研究中,50名近视(范围为-1.00至-4.50 D)且未老花的眼镜或软性隐形眼镜佩戴者(年龄范围为16 - 39岁)佩戴角膜塑形术(OK)隐形眼镜。在OK镜片验配前后,使用标准化双眼视觉测试设备(Oculus Binoptometer 4P)在一天中的三个时段,即上午、下午和晚上,进行视力、对比敏感度、中间视觉和眩光敏感度的测量。单眼和双眼视力根据ISO 8596进行测试,并与不同国家汽车和摩托车驾驶员的要求进行比较。

结果

与之前的矫正相比,角膜塑形术的双眼视力(logMAR)在上午(0.04 ± 0.12;p < 0.05)和下午(0.04 ± 0.10;p < 0.05)有统计学意义的改善,而在晚上差异无统计学意义(p = 0.512)。此外,上午(p = 0.813)、下午(p = 0.742)或晚上(p = 0.945)的对比敏感度无统计学意义的差异。对于中间视觉和眩光敏感度,与之前的矫正相比,角膜塑形术在上午(p = 0.083;p = 1.000)、下午(p = 0.054;p = 0.125)或晚上(p = 0.195;p = 0.635)所达到的对比水平无统计学意义的差异。采用角膜塑形术时,双眼视力、对比敏感度、中间视觉或眩光敏感度未发现有统计学意义的昼夜变化(p > 0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,OK镜片佩戴者的视觉功能在一天中保持稳定,且与之前的矫正效果相当。虽然各国的驾驶视觉标准并不统一,但所有国家的视力要求均能满足。作为影响驾驶性能的其他方面,中间视觉和眩光敏感度在一天中似乎也保持恒定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验