• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生态范式在保护区背景下的跨文化应用。

Cross-Cultural Applications of the New Ecological Paradigm in Protected Area Contexts.

作者信息

Dorward Leejiah, Ibbett Harriet, Dwiyahreni Asri A, Kohi Edward, Prayitno Karlina, Sankeni Stephen, Kaduma Joseph, Mawenya Rose, Mchomvu Jesca, Sabiladiyni Humairah, Saputra Andie Wijaya, Supriatna Jatna, Trywidiarini Tyassanti, St John Freya A V

机构信息

School of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Bangor University, UK.

Conservation and Human Behaviour Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

Environ Behav. 2024 Feb;56(1-2):120-151. doi: 10.1177/00139165241274623. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1177/00139165241274623
PMID:39659811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7617222/
Abstract

Working mostly in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic countries, environmental psychologists have developed scales assessing relationships between pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. Working in Tanzanian and Indonesian protected area landscapes, containing important biodiversity and conflict over human-nature interactions, we investigate the utility of the New Ecological Paradigm for measuring pro-environmental beliefs and understanding support for protected area regulations. We found the New Ecological Paradigm ineffective at measuring pro-environmental beliefs in both countries; in Tanzania due to acquiescence bias, and in Indonesia exploratory factor analysis supported none of the original factors, with 4 of 15 statements loading onto a novel "eco-fragility" factor. Individual statements in both countries and the eco-fragility factor in Indonesia were weakly correlated with support for protected area regulations, highlighting while elements of the New Ecological Paradigm can improve understanding of support for protected area regulations, care must be taken when applying psychometric tools in novel cultural contexts.

摘要

环境心理学家大多在西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主的国家开展工作,他们开发了一些量表来评估亲环境信念与行为之间的关系。我们在坦桑尼亚和印度尼西亚的保护区开展研究,这些地区拥有重要的生物多样性,且存在人与自然互动方面的冲突,我们探究了新生态范式在衡量亲环境信念以及理解对保护区法规的支持方面的效用。我们发现,新生态范式在这两个国家衡量亲环境信念时均无效;在坦桑尼亚是由于默许偏差,而在印度尼西亚,探索性因素分析并未支持任何一个原始因素,15条陈述中有4条加载到了一个新的“生态脆弱性”因素上。这两个国家的个体陈述以及印度尼西亚的生态脆弱性因素与对保护区法规的支持之间的相关性较弱,这突出表明,虽然新生态范式的元素有助于增进对保护区法规支持的理解,但在新的文化背景下应用心理测量工具时必须谨慎。

相似文献

1
Cross-Cultural Applications of the New Ecological Paradigm in Protected Area Contexts.新生态范式在保护区背景下的跨文化应用。
Environ Behav. 2024 Feb;56(1-2):120-151. doi: 10.1177/00139165241274623. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Experimental validation of specialized questioning techniques in conservation.保护领域专门提问技术的实验验证。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Oct;36(5):e13908. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13908. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance.超越西方、有教养、工业化、富有和民主(WEIRD)心理学:衡量和绘制文化和心理距离的尺度。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):678-701. doi: 10.1177/0956797620916782. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Achieving international biodiversity targets: Learning from local norms, values and actions regarding migratory waterfowl management in Kazakhstan.实现国际生物多样性目标:借鉴哈萨克斯坦关于迁徙水鸟管理的地方规范、价值观和行动。
J Appl Ecol. 2022 Jul;59(7):1911-1924. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14198. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
Adapting environmental function analysis for management of protected areas in small islands--case of Pico Island (the Azores).调整环境功能分析以用于小岛屿保护区管理——皮库岛(亚速尔群岛)案例
J Environ Manage. 2016 Apr 15;171:231-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Combining ecological, eco-cultural, and environmental justice parameters to create Eco-EJ indicators to monitor cultural and environmental justices for diverse communities around contaminated sites.结合生态、生态文化和环境正义参数,创建生态环境正义指标,以监测受污染场地周边不同社区的文化和环境正义情况。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Feb 12;194(3):177. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09535-8.
7
Improving compliance around protected areas through fair administration of rules.通过公正执行规则提高保护区周边的合规性。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Feb;39(1):e14332. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14332. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
8
Participation in protected area governance: A systematic case survey of the evidence on ecological and social outcomes.参与保护区治理:关于生态和社会成果证据的系统案例调查。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jun 15;336:117593. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117593. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Environmental interactions between people and birds in semiarid lands of the Zapotitlán Valley, Central Mexico.中墨西哥萨波特兰山谷半干旱地区人与鸟类的环境相互作用。
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020 Jun 5;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13002-020-00385-1.
10
Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.南巴塔哥尼亚多分类生物多样性评估:为不同景观的保护策略提供支持。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 1;307:114578. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114578. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Using lessons from criminal justice research to improve conservation law enforcement research and practice.借鉴刑事司法研究的经验教训,以改进保护执法研究与实践。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Jul 3:e70094. doi: 10.1111/cobi.70094.

本文引用的文献

1
A mixed methods approach for measuring topic sensitivity in conservation.一种用于衡量保护领域主题敏感性的混合方法。
People Nat (Hoboken). 2023 Aug;5(4):1245-1261. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10501.
2
Topic sensitivity still affects honest responding, even when specialized questioning techniques are used.话题敏感性仍然会影响如实回答,即使使用了专门的提问技巧。
Conserv Sci Pract. 2023 Mar 31;5(6). doi: 10.1111/csp2.12927. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Evaluation of the use of psychometric scales in human-wildlife interaction research to determine attitudes and tolerance toward wildlife.评估心理计量量表在人类与野生动物相互作用研究中的使用,以确定对野生动物的态度和容忍度。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Apr;35(2):533-547. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13599. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
4
Bounded authority: Expanding "appropriate" police behavior beyond procedural justice.有限权威:超越程序正义扩大“适当”警察行为。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;42(3):280-293. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000285.
5
Revisiting the promise of conservation psychology.重新审视保护心理学的前景。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Dec;32(6):1464-1468. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13106.
6
Social values and biodiversity conservation in a dynamic world.动态世界中的社会价值观与生物多样性保护
Conserv Biol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1212-1221. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12742. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas.全球保护区的社会和保护成果评估。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):133-41. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12568. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
8
High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.高分辨率的 21 世纪全球森林覆盖变化地图集。
Science. 2013 Nov 15;342(6160):850-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693.
9
The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure.默许对人格结构评估的影响。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1137-45. doi: 10.1037/a0033323. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
10
Refining the theory of basic individual values.完善基本个体价值观理论。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Oct;103(4):663-88. doi: 10.1037/a0029393. Epub 2012 Jul 23.