Vaculíková Jitka
Research Centre of the Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czechia.
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 26;15:1382989. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382989. eCollection 2024.
An active and constructive process whereby individuals possess the ability to develop, implement, and flexibly maintain planned behavior in order to achieve a desired achievement goal is referred to as self-regulation. The aim of the present study is to examine the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the Self-Regulation Questionnaire, validated in the Czech educational context (SRQ-CZ). The other target is to identify any usage of self-regulation strategies which may differ as nationality, gender, age, education, and internal motivation to learn come into play. A total of 1,711 adult learners from Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic who were enrolled in a formal secondary or higher education system pursuing professions in the field of humanities, social and health care sciences participated in this study. A measurement-invariant four-factor model was obtained across all countries (min. CFI, TLI = 0.918, and 0.902, max. RMSEA = 0.059; between 0.625 and 0.838, and Cronbach's between 0.622 and 0.837), including the Impulse Control, Goal Orientation, Self-Direction, and Decision Making subscales. Generally, the study confirmed a gradual increase in scores that measure positive self-regulatory qualities (Goal Orientation and Decision Making) and a decrease in unfavorable self-regulatory qualities (Impulse Control and Self-Direction) with higher age, education, and motivation, with no gender differences reported within countries. Moreover, scores on Goal Orientation and Decision Making dominated between countries. In conclusion, the SRQ-CZ demonstrated its suitability for cross-national comparisons, and personal characteristics appear to be important factors that distinguish those with high and low self-regulation.
个体具备发展、实施并灵活维持计划行为以实现期望成就目标的积极且建设性的过程被称为自我调节。本研究的目的是检验在捷克教育背景下验证的自我调节问卷(SRQ-CZ)的因子结构和心理测量特性。另一个目标是确定随着国籍、性别、年龄、教育程度以及学习的内部动机的作用,自我调节策略的任何使用差异。共有1711名来自波兰、塞尔维亚、斯洛伐克和捷克共和国的成年学习者参与了本研究,他们就读于正规的中等或高等教育系统,从事人文、社会和医疗保健科学领域的职业。在所有国家中获得了一个测量不变的四因素模型(最小CFI、TLI = 0.918和0.902,最大RMSEA = 0.059;在0.625和0.838之间,Cronbach's在0.622和0.837之间),包括冲动控制、目标导向、自我指导和决策子量表。总体而言,研究证实随着年龄、教育程度和动机的提高,测量积极自我调节品质(目标导向和决策)的分数逐渐增加,而不利的自我调节品质(冲动控制和自我指导)的分数则下降,各国均未报告性别差异。此外,目标导向和决策的分数在各国之间占主导地位。总之,SRQ-CZ证明了其适用于跨国比较,个人特征似乎是区分自我调节高低者的重要因素。